Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 00/18] qom: dynamic properties and composition tree (v2)

[Paolo Bonzini]

On 12/05/2011 05:38 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > >
> >
> > -device would use parse/print, not get/set. So it would still use the
> > strings.
>
> I don't want -device to have special knowledge of properties.  I want it
> to set the properties are strings.  The property implementation is
> private to Object.

Ok, I see where you're coming from with legacy properties too.  Yeah, 
then it makes sense to rename properties (to legacy<name> perhaps) as 
long as the equivalent "name" property is available that uses visitors. 
 I.e. each qdev property would be registered twice, with two different 
names, one for QOM and one for -device.

Paolo