[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH] vfio: VFIO Driver core framework
|
From: |
Christian Benvenuti (benve) |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH] vfio: VFIO Driver core framework |
|
Date: |
Wed, 9 Nov 2011 02:11:16 -0600 |
I have not gone through the all patch yet, but here are
my first comments/questions about the code in vfio_main.c
(and pci/vfio_pci.c).
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alex Williamson [mailto:address@hidden
> Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2011 1:12 PM
> To: address@hidden; address@hidden; address@hidden;
> address@hidden; address@hidden; address@hidden; Christian
> Benvenuti (benve); Aaron Fabbri (aafabbri); address@hidden;
> address@hidden; address@hidden; address@hidden;
> address@hidden; address@hidden; address@hidden
> foundation.org; address@hidden
> Subject: [RFC PATCH] vfio: VFIO Driver core framework
<snip>
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..6169356
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,1151 @@
> +/*
> + * VFIO framework
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2011 Red Hat, Inc. All rights reserved.
> + * Author: Alex Williamson <address@hidden>
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + *
> + * Derived from original vfio:
> + * Copyright 2010 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.
> + * Author: Tom Lyon, address@hidden
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/cdev.h>
> +#include <linux/compat.h>
> +#include <linux/device.h>
> +#include <linux/file.h>
> +#include <linux/anon_inodes.h>
> +#include <linux/fs.h>
> +#include <linux/idr.h>
> +#include <linux/iommu.h>
> +#include <linux/mm.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/string.h>
> +#include <linux/uaccess.h>
> +#include <linux/vfio.h>
> +#include <linux/wait.h>
> +
> +#include "vfio_private.h"
> +
> +#define DRIVER_VERSION "0.2"
> +#define DRIVER_AUTHOR "Alex Williamson <address@hidden>"
> +#define DRIVER_DESC "VFIO - User Level meta-driver"
> +
> +static int allow_unsafe_intrs;
> +module_param(allow_unsafe_intrs, int, 0);
> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(allow_unsafe_intrs,
> + "Allow use of IOMMUs which do not support interrupt
> remapping");
> +
> +static struct vfio {
> + dev_t devt;
> + struct cdev cdev;
> + struct list_head group_list;
> + struct mutex lock;
> + struct kref kref;
> + struct class *class;
> + struct idr idr;
> + wait_queue_head_t release_q;
> +} vfio;
> +
> +static const struct file_operations vfio_group_fops;
> +extern const struct file_operations vfio_iommu_fops;
> +
> +struct vfio_group {
> + dev_t devt;
> + unsigned int groupid;
This groupid is returned by the device_group callback you recently added
with a separate (not yet in tree) IOMMU patch.
Is it correct to say that the scope of this ID is the bus the iommu
belongs too (but you use it as if it was global)?
I believe there is nothing right now to ensure the uniqueness of such
ID across bus types (assuming there will be other bus drivers in the
future besides vfio-pci).
If that's the case, the vfio.group_list global list and the __vfio_lookup_dev
routine should be changed to account for the bus too?
Ops, I just saw the error msg in vfio_group_add_dev about the group id conflict.
Is that warning related to what I mentioned above?
> + struct bus_type *bus;
> + struct vfio_iommu *iommu;
> + struct list_head device_list;
> + struct list_head iommu_next;
> + struct list_head group_next;
> + int refcnt;
> +};
> +
> +struct vfio_device {
> + struct device *dev;
> + const struct vfio_device_ops *ops;
> + struct vfio_iommu *iommu;
I wonder if you need to have the 'iommu' field here.
vfio_device.iommu is always set and reset together with
vfio_group.iommu.
Given that a vfio_device instance is always linked to a vfio_group
instance, do we need this duplication? Is this duplication there
because you do not want the double dereference device->group->iommu?
> + struct vfio_group *group;
> + struct list_head device_next;
> + bool attached;
> + int refcnt;
> + void *device_data;
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * Helper functions called under vfio.lock
> + */
> +
> +/* Return true if any devices within a group are opened */
> +static bool __vfio_group_devs_inuse(struct vfio_group *group)
> +{
> + struct list_head *pos;
> +
> + list_for_each(pos, &group->device_list) {
> + struct vfio_device *device;
> +
> + device = list_entry(pos, struct vfio_device, device_next);
> + if (device->refcnt)
> + return true;
> + }
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> +/* Return true if any of the groups attached to an iommu are opened.
> + * We can only tear apart merged groups when nothing is left open. */
> +static bool __vfio_iommu_groups_inuse(struct vfio_iommu *iommu)
> +{
> + struct list_head *pos;
> +
> + list_for_each(pos, &iommu->group_list) {
> + struct vfio_group *group;
> +
> + group = list_entry(pos, struct vfio_group, iommu_next);
> + if (group->refcnt)
> + return true;
> + }
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> +/* An iommu is "in use" if it has a file descriptor open or if any of
> + * the groups assigned to the iommu have devices open. */
> +static bool __vfio_iommu_inuse(struct vfio_iommu *iommu)
> +{
> + struct list_head *pos;
> +
> + if (iommu->refcnt)
> + return true;
> +
> + list_for_each(pos, &iommu->group_list) {
> + struct vfio_group *group;
> +
> + group = list_entry(pos, struct vfio_group, iommu_next);
> +
> + if (__vfio_group_devs_inuse(group))
> + return true;
> + }
> + return false;
> +}
I looked at how you take care of ref counts ...
This is how the tree of vfio_iommu/vfio_group/vfio_device data
Structures is organized (I'll use just iommu/group/dev to make
the graph smaller):
iommu
/ \
/ \
group ... group
/ \ / \
/ \ / \
dev .. dev dev .. dev
This is how you get a file descriptor for the three kind of objects:
- group : open /dev/vfio/xxx for group xxx
- iommu : group ioctl VFIO_GROUP_GET_IOMMU_FD
- device: group ioctl VFIO_GROUP_GET_DEVICE_FD
Given the above topology, I would assume that:
(1) an iommu is 'inuse' if : a) iommu refcnt > 0, or
b) any of its groups is 'inuse'
(2) a group is 'inuse' if : a) group refcnt > 0, or
b) any of its devices is 'inuse'
(3) a device is 'inuse' if : a) device refcnt > 0
You have coded the 'inuse' logic with these three routines:
__vfio_iommu_inuse, which implements (1) above
and
__vfio_iommu_groups_inuse
__vfio_group_devs_inuse
which are used by __vfio_iommu_inuse.
Why don't you check the group refcnt in __vfio_iommu_groups_inuse?
Would it make sense (and the code more readable) to structure the
nested refcnt/inuse check like this?
(The numbers (1)(2)(3) refer to the three 'inuse' conditions above)
(1)__vfio_iommu_inuse
|
+-> check iommu refcnt
+-> __vfio_iommu_groups_inuse
|
+->LOOP: (2)__vfio_iommu_group_inuse<--MISSING
|
+-> check group refcnt<--MISSING
+-> __vfio_group_devs_inuse()
|
+-> LOOP: (3)__vfio_group_dev_inuse<--MISSING
|
+-> check device refcnt
> +static void __vfio_group_set_iommu(struct vfio_group *group,
> + struct vfio_iommu *iommu)
> +{
> + struct list_head *pos;
> +
> + if (group->iommu)
> + list_del(&group->iommu_next);
> + if (iommu)
> + list_add(&group->iommu_next, &iommu->group_list);
> +
> + group->iommu = iommu;
If you remove the vfio_device.iommu field (as suggested above in a previous
Comment), the block below would not be needed anymore.
> + list_for_each(pos, &group->device_list) {
> + struct vfio_device *device;
> +
> + device = list_entry(pos, struct vfio_device, device_next);
> + device->iommu = iommu;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static void __vfio_iommu_detach_dev(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
> + struct vfio_device *device)
> +{
> + BUG_ON(!iommu->domain && device->attached);
> +
> + if (!iommu->domain || !device->attached)
> + return;
> +
> + iommu_detach_device(iommu->domain, device->dev);
> + device->attached = false;
> +}
> +
> +static void __vfio_iommu_detach_group(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
> + struct vfio_group *group)
> +{
> + struct list_head *pos;
> +
> + list_for_each(pos, &group->device_list) {
> + struct vfio_device *device;
> +
> + device = list_entry(pos, struct vfio_device, device_next);
> + __vfio_iommu_detach_dev(iommu, device);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static int __vfio_iommu_attach_dev(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
> + struct vfio_device *device)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + BUG_ON(device->attached);
> +
> + if (!iommu || !iommu->domain)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + ret = iommu_attach_device(iommu->domain, device->dev);
> + if (!ret)
> + device->attached = true;
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int __vfio_iommu_attach_group(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
> + struct vfio_group *group)
> +{
> + struct list_head *pos;
> +
> + list_for_each(pos, &group->device_list) {
> + struct vfio_device *device;
> + int ret;
> +
> + device = list_entry(pos, struct vfio_device, device_next);
> + ret = __vfio_iommu_attach_dev(iommu, device);
> + if (ret) {
> + __vfio_iommu_detach_group(iommu, group);
> + return ret;
> + }
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/* The iommu is viable, ie. ready to be configured, when all the
> devices
> + * for all the groups attached to the iommu are bound to their vfio
> device
> + * drivers (ex. vfio-pci). This sets the device_data private data
> pointer. */
> +static bool __vfio_iommu_viable(struct vfio_iommu *iommu)
> +{
> + struct list_head *gpos, *dpos;
> +
> + list_for_each(gpos, &iommu->group_list) {
> + struct vfio_group *group;
> + group = list_entry(gpos, struct vfio_group, iommu_next);
> +
> + list_for_each(dpos, &group->device_list) {
> + struct vfio_device *device;
> + device = list_entry(dpos,
> + struct vfio_device, device_next);
> +
> + if (!device->device_data)
> + return false;
> + }
> + }
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +static void __vfio_close_iommu(struct vfio_iommu *iommu)
> +{
> + struct list_head *pos;
> +
> + if (!iommu->domain)
> + return;
> +
> + list_for_each(pos, &iommu->group_list) {
> + struct vfio_group *group;
> + group = list_entry(pos, struct vfio_group, iommu_next);
> +
> + __vfio_iommu_detach_group(iommu, group);
> + }
> +
> + vfio_iommu_unmapall(iommu);
> +
> + iommu_domain_free(iommu->domain);
> + iommu->domain = NULL;
> + iommu->mm = NULL;
> +}
> +
> +/* Open the IOMMU. This gates all access to the iommu or device file
> + * descriptors and sets current->mm as the exclusive user. */
Given the fn vfio_group_open (ie, 1st object, 2nd operation), I would have
called this one __vfio_iommu_open (instead of __vfio_open_iommu).
Is it named __vfio_open_iommu to avoid a conflict with the namespace in
vfio_iommu.c?
> +static int __vfio_open_iommu(struct vfio_iommu *iommu)
> +{
> + struct list_head *pos;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!__vfio_iommu_viable(iommu))
> + return -EBUSY;
> +
> + if (iommu->domain)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + iommu->domain = iommu_domain_alloc(iommu->bus);
> + if (!iommu->domain)
> + return -EFAULT;
> +
> + list_for_each(pos, &iommu->group_list) {
> + struct vfio_group *group;
> + group = list_entry(pos, struct vfio_group, iommu_next);
> +
> + ret = __vfio_iommu_attach_group(iommu, group);
> + if (ret) {
> + __vfio_close_iommu(iommu);
> + return ret;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (!allow_unsafe_intrs &&
> + !iommu_domain_has_cap(iommu->domain, IOMMU_CAP_INTR_REMAP)) {
> + __vfio_close_iommu(iommu);
> + return -EFAULT;
> + }
> +
> + iommu->cache = (iommu_domain_has_cap(iommu->domain,
> + IOMMU_CAP_CACHE_COHERENCY) != 0);
> + iommu->mm = current->mm;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/* Actively try to tear down the iommu and merged groups. If there
> are no
> + * open iommu or device fds, we close the iommu. If we close the
> iommu and
> + * there are also no open group fds, we can futher dissolve the group
> to
> + * iommu association and free the iommu data structure. */
> +static int __vfio_try_dissolve_iommu(struct vfio_iommu *iommu)
> +{
> +
> + if (__vfio_iommu_inuse(iommu))
> + return -EBUSY;
> +
> + __vfio_close_iommu(iommu);
> +
> + if (!__vfio_iommu_groups_inuse(iommu)) {
> + struct list_head *pos, *ppos;
> +
> + list_for_each_safe(pos, ppos, &iommu->group_list) {
> + struct vfio_group *group;
> +
> + group = list_entry(pos, struct vfio_group,
> iommu_next);
> + __vfio_group_set_iommu(group, NULL);
> + }
> +
> +
> + kfree(iommu);
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct vfio_device *__vfio_lookup_dev(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct list_head *gpos;
> + unsigned int groupid;
> +
> + if (iommu_device_group(dev, &groupid))
> + return NULL;
> +
> + list_for_each(gpos, &vfio.group_list) {
> + struct vfio_group *group;
> + struct list_head *dpos;
> +
> + group = list_entry(gpos, struct vfio_group, group_next);
> +
> + if (group->groupid != groupid)
> + continue;
> +
> + list_for_each(dpos, &group->device_list) {
> + struct vfio_device *device;
> +
> + device = list_entry(dpos,
> + struct vfio_device, device_next);
> +
> + if (device->dev == dev)
> + return device;
> + }
> + }
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +/* All release paths simply decrement the refcnt, attempt to teardown
> + * the iommu and merged groups, and wakeup anything that might be
> + * waiting if we successfully dissolve anything. */
> +static int vfio_do_release(int *refcnt, struct vfio_iommu *iommu)
> +{
> + bool wake;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&vfio.lock);
> +
> + (*refcnt)--;
> + wake = (__vfio_try_dissolve_iommu(iommu) == 0);
> +
> + mutex_unlock(&vfio.lock);
> +
> + if (wake)
> + wake_up(&vfio.release_q);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Device fops - passthrough to vfio device driver w/ device_data
> + */
> +static int vfio_device_release(struct inode *inode, struct file
> *filep)
> +{
> + struct vfio_device *device = filep->private_data;
> +
> + vfio_do_release(&device->refcnt, device->iommu);
> +
> + device->ops->put(device->device_data);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static long vfio_device_unl_ioctl(struct file *filep,
> + unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
> +{
> + struct vfio_device *device = filep->private_data;
> +
> + return device->ops->ioctl(device->device_data, cmd, arg);
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t vfio_device_read(struct file *filep, char __user *buf,
> + size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
> +{
> + struct vfio_device *device = filep->private_data;
> +
> + return device->ops->read(device->device_data, buf, count, ppos);
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t vfio_device_write(struct file *filep, const char __user
> *buf,
> + size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
> +{
> + struct vfio_device *device = filep->private_data;
> +
> + return device->ops->write(device->device_data, buf, count, ppos);
> +}
> +
> +static int vfio_device_mmap(struct file *filep, struct vm_area_struct
> *vma)
> +{
> + struct vfio_device *device = filep->private_data;
> +
> + return device->ops->mmap(device->device_data, vma);
> +}
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> +static long vfio_device_compat_ioctl(struct file *filep,
> + unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
> +{
> + arg = (unsigned long)compat_ptr(arg);
> + return vfio_device_unl_ioctl(filep, cmd, arg);
> +}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_COMPAT */
> +
> +const struct file_operations vfio_device_fops = {
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> + .release = vfio_device_release,
> + .read = vfio_device_read,
> + .write = vfio_device_write,
> + .unlocked_ioctl = vfio_device_unl_ioctl,
> +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> + .compat_ioctl = vfio_device_compat_ioctl,
> +#endif
> + .mmap = vfio_device_mmap,
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * Group fops
> + */
> +static int vfio_group_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filep)
> +{
> + struct vfio_group *group;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&vfio.lock);
> +
> + group = idr_find(&vfio.idr, iminor(inode));
> +
> + if (!group) {
> + ret = -ENODEV;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + filep->private_data = group;
> +
> + if (!group->iommu) {
> + struct vfio_iommu *iommu;
> +
> + iommu = kzalloc(sizeof(*iommu), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!iommu) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto out;
> + }
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&iommu->group_list);
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&iommu->dm_list);
> + mutex_init(&iommu->dgate);
> + iommu->bus = group->bus;
> + __vfio_group_set_iommu(group, iommu);
> + }
> + group->refcnt++;
> +
> +out:
> + mutex_unlock(&vfio.lock);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int vfio_group_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filep)
> +{
> + struct vfio_group *group = filep->private_data;
> +
> + return vfio_do_release(&group->refcnt, group->iommu);
> +}
> +
> +/* Attempt to merge the group pointed to by fd into group. The merge-
> ee
> + * group must not have an iommu or any devices open because we cannot
> + * maintain that context across the merge. The merge-er group can be
> + * in use. */
> +static int vfio_group_merge(struct vfio_group *group, int fd)
The documentation in vfio.txt explains clearly the logic implemented by
the merge/unmerge group ioctls.
However, what you are doing is not merging groups, but rather adding/removing
groups to/from iommus (and creating flat lists of groups).
For example, when you do
merge(A,B)
you actually mean to say "merge B to the list of groups assigned to the
same iommu as group A".
For the same reason, you do not really need to provide the group you want
to unmerge from, which means that instead of
unmerge(A,B)
you would just need
unmerge(B)
I understand the reason why it is not a real merge/unmerge (ie, to keep the
original groups so that you can unmerge later) ... however I just wonder if
it wouldn't be more natural to implement the VFIO_IOMMU_ADD_GROUP/DEL_GROUP
iommu ioctls instead? (the relationships between the data structure would
remain the same)
I guess you already discarded this option for some reasons, right? What was
the reason?
> +{
> + struct vfio_group *new;
> + struct vfio_iommu *old_iommu;
> + struct file *file;
> + int ret = 0;
> + bool opened = false;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&vfio.lock);
> +
> + file = fget(fd);
> + if (!file) {
> + ret = -EBADF;
> + goto out_noput;
> + }
> +
> + /* Sanity check, is this really our fd? */
> + if (file->f_op != &vfio_group_fops) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + new = file->private_data;
> +
> + if (!new || new == group || !new->iommu ||
> + new->iommu->domain || new->bus != group->bus) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + /* We need to attach all the devices to each domain separately
> + * in order to validate that the capabilities match for both. */
> + ret = __vfio_open_iommu(new->iommu);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out;
> +
> + if (!group->iommu->domain) {
> + ret = __vfio_open_iommu(group->iommu);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out;
> + opened = true;
> + }
> +
> + /* If cache coherency doesn't match we'd potentialy need to
> + * remap existing iommu mappings in the merge-er domain.
> + * Poor return to bother trying to allow this currently. */
> + if (iommu_domain_has_cap(group->iommu->domain,
> + IOMMU_CAP_CACHE_COHERENCY) !=
> + iommu_domain_has_cap(new->iommu->domain,
> + IOMMU_CAP_CACHE_COHERENCY)) {
> + __vfio_close_iommu(new->iommu);
> + if (opened)
> + __vfio_close_iommu(group->iommu);
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + /* Close the iommu for the merge-ee and attach all its devices
> + * to the merge-er iommu. */
> + __vfio_close_iommu(new->iommu);
> +
> + ret = __vfio_iommu_attach_group(group->iommu, new);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out;
> +
> + /* set_iommu unlinks new from the iommu, so save a pointer to it
> */
> + old_iommu = new->iommu;
> + __vfio_group_set_iommu(new, group->iommu);
> + kfree(old_iommu);
> +
> +out:
> + fput(file);
> +out_noput:
> + mutex_unlock(&vfio.lock);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/* Unmerge the group pointed to by fd from group. */
> +static int vfio_group_unmerge(struct vfio_group *group, int fd)
> +{
> + struct vfio_group *new;
> + struct vfio_iommu *new_iommu;
> + struct file *file;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + /* Since the merge-out group is already opened, it needs to
> + * have an iommu struct associated with it. */
> + new_iommu = kzalloc(sizeof(*new_iommu), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!new_iommu)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&new_iommu->group_list);
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&new_iommu->dm_list);
> + mutex_init(&new_iommu->dgate);
> + new_iommu->bus = group->bus;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&vfio.lock);
> +
> + file = fget(fd);
> + if (!file) {
> + ret = -EBADF;
> + goto out_noput;
> + }
> +
> + /* Sanity check, is this really our fd? */
> + if (file->f_op != &vfio_group_fops) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + new = file->private_data;
> + if (!new || new == group || new->iommu != group->iommu) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + /* We can't merge-out a group with devices still in use. */
> + if (__vfio_group_devs_inuse(new)) {
> + ret = -EBUSY;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + __vfio_iommu_detach_group(group->iommu, new);
> + __vfio_group_set_iommu(new, new_iommu);
> +
> +out:
> + fput(file);
> +out_noput:
> + if (ret)
> + kfree(new_iommu);
> + mutex_unlock(&vfio.lock);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/* Get a new iommu file descriptor. This will open the iommu, setting
> + * the current->mm ownership if it's not already set. */
> +static int vfio_group_get_iommu_fd(struct vfio_group *group)
> +{
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&vfio.lock);
> +
> + if (!group->iommu->domain) {
> + ret = __vfio_open_iommu(group->iommu);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + ret = anon_inode_getfd("[vfio-iommu]", &vfio_iommu_fops,
> + group->iommu, O_RDWR);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto out;
> +
> + group->iommu->refcnt++;
> +out:
> + mutex_unlock(&vfio.lock);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/* Get a new device file descriptor. This will open the iommu,
> setting
> + * the current->mm ownership if it's not already set. It's difficult
> to
> + * specify the requirements for matching a user supplied buffer to a
> + * device, so we use a vfio driver callback to test for a match. For
> + * PCI, dev_name(dev) is unique, but other drivers may require
> including
> + * a parent device string. */
> +static int vfio_group_get_device_fd(struct vfio_group *group, char
> *buf)
> +{
> + struct vfio_iommu *iommu = group->iommu;
> + struct list_head *gpos;
> + int ret = -ENODEV;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&vfio.lock);
> +
> + if (!iommu->domain) {
> + ret = __vfio_open_iommu(iommu);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + list_for_each(gpos, &iommu->group_list) {
> + struct list_head *dpos;
> +
> + group = list_entry(gpos, struct vfio_group, iommu_next);
> +
> + list_for_each(dpos, &group->device_list) {
> + struct vfio_device *device;
> +
> + device = list_entry(dpos,
> + struct vfio_device, device_next);
> +
> + if (device->ops->match(device->dev, buf)) {
> + struct file *file;
> +
> + if (device->ops->get(device->device_data)) {
> + ret = -EFAULT;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + /* We can't use anon_inode_getfd(), like above
> + * because we need to modify the f_mode flags
> + * directly to allow more than just ioctls */
> + ret = get_unused_fd();
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + device->ops->put(device->device_data);
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + file = anon_inode_getfile("[vfio-device]",
> + &vfio_device_fops,
> + device, O_RDWR);
> + if (IS_ERR(file)) {
> + put_unused_fd(ret);
> + ret = PTR_ERR(file);
> + device->ops->put(device->device_data);
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + /* Todo: add an anon_inode interface to do
> + * this. Appears to be missing by lack of
> + * need rather than explicitly prevented.
> + * Now there's need. */
> + file->f_mode |= (FMODE_LSEEK |
> + FMODE_PREAD |
> + FMODE_PWRITE);
> +
> + fd_install(ret, file);
> +
> + device->refcnt++;
> + goto out;
> + }
> + }
> + }
> +out:
> + mutex_unlock(&vfio.lock);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static long vfio_group_unl_ioctl(struct file *filep,
> + unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
> +{
> + struct vfio_group *group = filep->private_data;
> +
> + if (cmd == VFIO_GROUP_GET_FLAGS) {
> + u64 flags = 0;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&vfio.lock);
> + if (__vfio_iommu_viable(group->iommu))
> + flags |= VFIO_GROUP_FLAGS_VIABLE;
> + mutex_unlock(&vfio.lock);
> +
> + if (group->iommu->mm)
> + flags |= VFIO_GROUP_FLAGS_MM_LOCKED;
> +
> + return put_user(flags, (u64 __user *)arg);
> + }
> +
> + /* Below commands are restricted once the mm is set */
> + if (group->iommu->mm && group->iommu->mm != current->mm)
> + return -EPERM;
> + if (cmd == VFIO_GROUP_MERGE || cmd == VFIO_GROUP_UNMERGE) {
> + int fd;
> +
> + if (get_user(fd, (int __user *)arg))
> + return -EFAULT;
> + if (fd < 0)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (cmd == VFIO_GROUP_MERGE)
> + return vfio_group_merge(group, fd);
> + else
> + return vfio_group_unmerge(group, fd);
> + } else if (cmd == VFIO_GROUP_GET_IOMMU_FD) {
> + return vfio_group_get_iommu_fd(group);
> + } else if (cmd == VFIO_GROUP_GET_DEVICE_FD) {
> + char *buf;
> + int ret;
> +
> + buf = strndup_user((const char __user *)arg, PAGE_SIZE);
> + if (IS_ERR(buf))
> + return PTR_ERR(buf);
> +
> + ret = vfio_group_get_device_fd(group, buf);
> + kfree(buf);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + return -ENOSYS;
> +}
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> +static long vfio_group_compat_ioctl(struct file *filep,
> + unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
> +{
> + arg = (unsigned long)compat_ptr(arg);
> + return vfio_group_unl_ioctl(filep, cmd, arg);
> +}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_COMPAT */
> +
> +static const struct file_operations vfio_group_fops = {
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> + .open = vfio_group_open,
> + .release = vfio_group_release,
> + .unlocked_ioctl = vfio_group_unl_ioctl,
> +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> + .compat_ioctl = vfio_group_compat_ioctl,
> +#endif
> +};
> +
> +/* iommu fd release hook */
Given vfio_device_release and
vfio_group_release (ie, 1st object, 2nd operation), I was
going to suggest renaming the fn below to vfio_iommu_release, but
then I saw the latter name being already used in vfio_iommu.c ...
a bit confusing but I guess it's ok then.
> +int vfio_release_iommu(struct vfio_iommu *iommu)
> +{
> + return vfio_do_release(&iommu->refcnt, iommu);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * VFIO driver API
> + */
> +
> +/* Add a new device to the vfio framework with associated vfio driver
> + * callbacks. This is the entry point for vfio drivers to register
> devices. */
> +int vfio_group_add_dev(struct device *dev, const struct
> vfio_device_ops *ops)
> +{
> + struct list_head *pos;
> + struct vfio_group *group = NULL;
> + struct vfio_device *device = NULL;
> + unsigned int groupid;
> + int ret = 0;
> + bool new_group = false;
> +
> + if (!ops)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (iommu_device_group(dev, &groupid))
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&vfio.lock);
> +
> + list_for_each(pos, &vfio.group_list) {
> + group = list_entry(pos, struct vfio_group, group_next);
> + if (group->groupid == groupid)
> + break;
> + group = NULL;
> + }
> +
> + if (!group) {
> + int minor;
> +
> + if (unlikely(idr_pre_get(&vfio.idr, GFP_KERNEL) == 0)) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + group = kzalloc(sizeof(*group), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!group) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + group->groupid = groupid;
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&group->device_list);
> +
> + ret = idr_get_new(&vfio.idr, group, &minor);
> + if (ret == 0 && minor > MINORMASK) {
> + idr_remove(&vfio.idr, minor);
> + kfree(group);
> + ret = -ENOSPC;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + group->devt = MKDEV(MAJOR(vfio.devt), minor);
> + device_create(vfio.class, NULL, group->devt,
> + group, "%u", groupid);
> +
> + group->bus = dev->bus;
> + list_add(&group->group_next, &vfio.group_list);
> + new_group = true;
> + } else {
> + if (group->bus != dev->bus) {
> + printk(KERN_WARNING
> + "Error: IOMMU group ID conflict. Group ID %u
> "
> + "on both bus %s and %s\n", groupid,
> + group->bus->name, dev->bus->name);
> + ret = -EFAULT;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + list_for_each(pos, &group->device_list) {
> + device = list_entry(pos,
> + struct vfio_device, device_next);
> + if (device->dev == dev)
> + break;
> + device = NULL;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (!device) {
> + if (__vfio_group_devs_inuse(group) ||
> + (group->iommu && group->iommu->refcnt)) {
> + printk(KERN_WARNING
> + "Adding device %s to group %u while group is
> already in use!!\n",
> + dev_name(dev), group->groupid);
> + /* XXX How to prevent other drivers from claiming? */
Here we are adding a device (not yet assigned to a vfio bus) to a group
that is already in use.
Given that it would not be acceptable for this device to get assigned
to a non vfio driver, why not forcing such assignment here then?
I am not sure though what the best way to do it would be.
What about something like this:
- when the bus vfio-pci processes the BUS_NOTIFY_ADD_DEVICE
notification it assigns to the device a PCI ID that will make sure
the vfio-pci's probe routine will be invoked (and no other driver can
therefore claim the device). That PCI ID would have to be added
to the vfio_pci_driver's id_table (it would be the exception to the
"only dynamic IDs" rule). Too hackish?
> + }
> +
> + device = kzalloc(sizeof(*device), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!device) {
> + /* If we just created this group, tear it down */
> + if (new_group) {
> + list_del(&group->group_next);
> + device_destroy(vfio.class, group->devt);
> + idr_remove(&vfio.idr, MINOR(group->devt));
> + kfree(group);
> + }
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + list_add(&device->device_next, &group->device_list);
> + device->dev = dev;
> + device->ops = ops;
> + device->iommu = group->iommu; /* NULL if new */
Shouldn't you check the return code of __vfio_iommu_attach_dev?
> + __vfio_iommu_attach_dev(group->iommu, device);
> + }
> +out:
> + mutex_unlock(&vfio.lock);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_group_add_dev);
> +
> +/* Remove a device from the vfio framework */
This fn below does not return any error code. Ok ...
However, there are a number of errors case that you test, for example
- device that does not belong to any group (according to iommu API)
- device that belongs to a group but that does not appear in the list
of devices of the vfio_group structure.
Are the above two errors checks just paranoia or are those errors actually
possible?
If they were possible, shouldn't we generate a warning (most probably
it would be a bug in the code)?
> +void vfio_group_del_dev(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct list_head *pos;
> + struct vfio_group *group = NULL;
> + struct vfio_device *device = NULL;
> + unsigned int groupid;
> +
> + if (iommu_device_group(dev, &groupid))
> + return;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&vfio.lock);
> +
> + list_for_each(pos, &vfio.group_list) {
> + group = list_entry(pos, struct vfio_group, group_next);
> + if (group->groupid == groupid)
> + break;
> + group = NULL;
> + }
> +
> + if (!group)
> + goto out;
> +
> + list_for_each(pos, &group->device_list) {
> + device = list_entry(pos, struct vfio_device, device_next);
> + if (device->dev == dev)
> + break;
> + device = NULL;
> + }
> +
> + if (!device)
> + goto out;
> +
> + BUG_ON(device->refcnt);
> +
> + if (device->attached)
> + __vfio_iommu_detach_dev(group->iommu, device);
> +
> + list_del(&device->device_next);
> + kfree(device);
> +
> + /* If this was the only device in the group, remove the group.
> + * Note that we intentionally unmerge empty groups here if the
> + * group fd isn't opened. */
> + if (list_empty(&group->device_list) && group->refcnt == 0) {
> + struct vfio_iommu *iommu = group->iommu;
> +
> + if (iommu) {
> + __vfio_group_set_iommu(group, NULL);
> + __vfio_try_dissolve_iommu(iommu);
> + }
> +
> + device_destroy(vfio.class, group->devt);
> + idr_remove(&vfio.idr, MINOR(group->devt));
> + list_del(&group->group_next);
> + kfree(group);
> + }
> +out:
> + mutex_unlock(&vfio.lock);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_group_del_dev);
> +
> +/* When a device is bound to a vfio device driver (ex. vfio-pci), this
> + * entry point is used to mark the device usable (viable). The vfio
> + * device driver associates a private device_data struct with the
> device
> + * here, which will later be return for vfio_device_fops callbacks. */
> +int vfio_bind_dev(struct device *dev, void *device_data)
> +{
> + struct vfio_device *device;
> + int ret = -EINVAL;
> +
> + BUG_ON(!device_data);
> +
> + mutex_lock(&vfio.lock);
> +
> + device = __vfio_lookup_dev(dev);
> +
> + BUG_ON(!device);
> +
> + ret = dev_set_drvdata(dev, device);
> + if (!ret)
> + device->device_data = device_data;
> +
> + mutex_unlock(&vfio.lock);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_bind_dev);
> +
> +/* A device is only removeable if the iommu for the group is not in
> use. */
> +static bool vfio_device_removeable(struct vfio_device *device)
> +{
> + bool ret = true;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&vfio.lock);
> +
> + if (device->iommu && __vfio_iommu_inuse(device->iommu))
> + ret = false;
> +
> + mutex_unlock(&vfio.lock);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/* Notify vfio that a device is being unbound from the vfio device
> driver
> + * and return the device private device_data pointer. If the group is
> + * in use, we need to block or take other measures to make it safe for
> + * the device to be removed from the iommu. */
> +void *vfio_unbind_dev(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct vfio_device *device = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> + void *device_data;
> +
> + BUG_ON(!device);
> +
> +again:
> + if (!vfio_device_removeable(device)) {
> + /* XXX signal for all devices in group to be removed or
> + * resort to killing the process holding the device fds.
> + * For now just block waiting for releases to wake us. */
> + wait_event(vfio.release_q, vfio_device_removeable(device));
Any new idea/proposal on how to handle this situation?
The last one I remember was to leave the soft/hard/etc timeout handling in
userspace and implement it as a sort of policy. Is that one still the most
likely candidate solution to handle this situation?
> + }
> +
> + mutex_lock(&vfio.lock);
> +
> + /* Need to re-check that the device is still removeable under
> lock. */
> + if (device->iommu && __vfio_iommu_inuse(device->iommu)) {
> + mutex_unlock(&vfio.lock);
> + goto again;
> + }
> +
> + device_data = device->device_data;
> +
> + device->device_data = NULL;
> + dev_set_drvdata(dev, NULL);
> +
> + mutex_unlock(&vfio.lock);
> + return device_data;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_unbind_dev);
> +
> +/*
> + * Module/class support
> + */
> +static void vfio_class_release(struct kref *kref)
> +{
> + class_destroy(vfio.class);
> + vfio.class = NULL;
> +}
> +
> +static char *vfio_devnode(struct device *dev, mode_t *mode)
> +{
> + return kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "vfio/%s", dev_name(dev));
> +}
> +
> +static int __init vfio_init(void)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + idr_init(&vfio.idr);
> + mutex_init(&vfio.lock);
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vfio.group_list);
> + init_waitqueue_head(&vfio.release_q);
> +
> + kref_init(&vfio.kref);
> + vfio.class = class_create(THIS_MODULE, "vfio");
> + if (IS_ERR(vfio.class)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(vfio.class);
> + goto err_class;
> + }
> +
> + vfio.class->devnode = vfio_devnode;
> +
> + /* FIXME - how many minors to allocate... all of them! */
> + ret = alloc_chrdev_region(&vfio.devt, 0, MINORMASK, "vfio");
> + if (ret)
> + goto err_chrdev;
> +
> + cdev_init(&vfio.cdev, &vfio_group_fops);
> + ret = cdev_add(&vfio.cdev, vfio.devt, MINORMASK);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err_cdev;
> +
> + pr_info(DRIVER_DESC " version: " DRIVER_VERSION "\n");
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +err_cdev:
> + unregister_chrdev_region(vfio.devt, MINORMASK);
> +err_chrdev:
> + kref_put(&vfio.kref, vfio_class_release);
> +err_class:
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void __exit vfio_cleanup(void)
> +{
> + struct list_head *gpos, *gppos;
> +
> + list_for_each_safe(gpos, gppos, &vfio.group_list) {
> + struct vfio_group *group;
> + struct list_head *dpos, *dppos;
> +
> + group = list_entry(gpos, struct vfio_group, group_next);
> +
> + list_for_each_safe(dpos, dppos, &group->device_list) {
> + struct vfio_device *device;
> +
> + device = list_entry(dpos,
> + struct vfio_device, device_next);
> + vfio_group_del_dev(device->dev);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + idr_destroy(&vfio.idr);
> + cdev_del(&vfio.cdev);
> + unregister_chrdev_region(vfio.devt, MINORMASK);
> + kref_put(&vfio.kref, vfio_class_release);
> +}
> +
> +module_init(vfio_init);
> +module_exit(vfio_cleanup);
> +
> +MODULE_VERSION(DRIVER_VERSION);
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> +MODULE_AUTHOR(DRIVER_AUTHOR);
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION(DRIVER_DESC);
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_private.h b/drivers/vfio/vfio_private.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..350ad67
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_private.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2011 Red Hat, Inc. All rights reserved.
> + * Author: Alex Williamson <address@hidden>
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + *
> + * Derived from original vfio:
> + * Copyright 2010 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.
> + * Author: Tom Lyon, address@hidden
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/list.h>
> +#include <linux/mutex.h>
> +
> +#ifndef VFIO_PRIVATE_H
> +#define VFIO_PRIVATE_H
> +
> +struct vfio_iommu {
> + struct iommu_domain *domain;
> + struct bus_type *bus;
> + struct mutex dgate;
> + struct list_head dm_list;
> + struct mm_struct *mm;
> + struct list_head group_list;
> + int refcnt;
> + bool cache;
> +};
> +
> +extern int vfio_release_iommu(struct vfio_iommu *iommu);
> +extern void vfio_iommu_unmapall(struct vfio_iommu *iommu);
> +
> +#endif /* VFIO_PRIVATE_H */
> diff --git a/include/linux/vfio.h b/include/linux/vfio.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..4269b08
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/linux/vfio.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,155 @@
> +/*
> + * Copyright 2010 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.
> + * Author: Tom Lyon, address@hidden
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you may redistribute it and/or
> modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published
> by
> + * the Free Software Foundation; version 2 of the License.
> + *
> + * THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND,
> + * EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF
> + * MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND
> + * NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS
> + * BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN
> + * ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN
> + * CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE
> + * SOFTWARE.
> + *
> + * Portions derived from drivers/uio/uio.c:
> + * Copyright(C) 2005, Benedikt Spranger <address@hidden>
> + * Copyright(C) 2005, Thomas Gleixner <address@hidden>
> + * Copyright(C) 2006, Hans J. Koch <address@hidden>
> + * Copyright(C) 2006, Greg Kroah-Hartman <address@hidden>
> + *
> + * Portions derived from drivers/uio/uio_pci_generic.c:
> + * Copyright (C) 2009 Red Hat, Inc.
> + * Author: Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden>
> + */
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +
> +#ifndef VFIO_H
> +#define VFIO_H
> +
> +#ifdef __KERNEL__
> +
> +struct vfio_device_ops {
> + bool (*match)(struct device *, char *);
> + int (*get)(void *);
> + void (*put)(void *);
> + ssize_t (*read)(void *, char __user *,
> + size_t, loff_t *);
> + ssize_t (*write)(void *, const char __user *,
> + size_t, loff_t *);
> + long (*ioctl)(void *, unsigned int, unsigned long);
> + int (*mmap)(void *, struct vm_area_struct *);
> +};
> +
> +extern int vfio_group_add_dev(struct device *device,
> + const struct vfio_device_ops *ops);
> +extern void vfio_group_del_dev(struct device *device);
> +extern int vfio_bind_dev(struct device *device, void *device_data);
> +extern void *vfio_unbind_dev(struct device *device);
> +
> +#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
> +
> +/*
> + * VFIO driver - allow mapping and use of certain devices
> + * in unprivileged user processes. (If IOMMU is present)
> + * Especially useful for Virtual Function parts of SR-IOV devices
> + */
> +
> +
> +/* Kernel & User level defines for ioctls */
> +
> +#define VFIO_GROUP_GET_FLAGS _IOR(';', 100, __u64)
> + #define VFIO_GROUP_FLAGS_VIABLE (1 << 0)
> + #define VFIO_GROUP_FLAGS_MM_LOCKED (1 << 1)
> +#define VFIO_GROUP_MERGE _IOW(';', 101, int)
> +#define VFIO_GROUP_UNMERGE _IOW(';', 102, int)
> +#define VFIO_GROUP_GET_IOMMU_FD _IO(';', 103)
> +#define VFIO_GROUP_GET_DEVICE_FD _IOW(';', 104, char *)
> +
> +/*
> + * Structure for DMA mapping of user buffers
> + * vaddr, dmaaddr, and size must all be page aligned
> + */
> +struct vfio_dma_map {
> + __u64 len; /* length of structure */
> + __u64 vaddr; /* process virtual addr */
> + __u64 dmaaddr; /* desired and/or returned dma address */
> + __u64 size; /* size in bytes */
> + __u64 flags;
> +#define VFIO_DMA_MAP_FLAG_WRITE (1 << 0) /* req writeable DMA
> mem */
> +};
> +
> +#define VFIO_IOMMU_GET_FLAGS _IOR(';', 105, __u64)
> + /* Does the IOMMU support mapping any IOVA to any virtual address? */
> + #define VFIO_IOMMU_FLAGS_MAP_ANY (1 << 0)
> +#define VFIO_IOMMU_MAP_DMA _IOWR(';', 106, struct
> vfio_dma_map)
> +#define VFIO_IOMMU_UNMAP_DMA _IOWR(';', 107, struct
> vfio_dma_map)
> +
> +#define VFIO_DEVICE_GET_FLAGS _IOR(';', 108, __u64)
> + #define VFIO_DEVICE_FLAGS_PCI (1 << 0)
> + #define VFIO_DEVICE_FLAGS_DT (1 << 1)
> + #define VFIO_DEVICE_FLAGS_RESET (1 << 2)
> +#define VFIO_DEVICE_GET_NUM_REGIONS _IOR(';', 109, int)
> +
> +struct vfio_region_info {
> + __u32 len; /* length of structure */
> + __u32 index; /* region number */
> + __u64 size; /* size in bytes of region */
> + __u64 offset; /* start offset of region */
> + __u64 flags;
> +#define VFIO_REGION_INFO_FLAG_MMAP (1 << 0)
> +#define VFIO_REGION_INFO_FLAG_RO (1 << 1)
> +#define VFIO_REGION_INFO_FLAG_PHYS_VALID (1 << 2)
> + __u64 phys; /* physical address of region */
> +};
> +
> +#define VFIO_DEVICE_GET_REGION_INFO _IOWR(';', 110, struct
> vfio_region_info)
> +
> +#define VFIO_DEVICE_GET_NUM_IRQS _IOR(';', 111, int)
> +
> +struct vfio_irq_info {
> + __u32 len; /* length of structure */
> + __u32 index; /* IRQ number */
> + __u32 count; /* number of individual IRQs */
> + __u32 flags;
> +#define VFIO_IRQ_INFO_FLAG_LEVEL (1 << 0)
> +};
> +
> +#define VFIO_DEVICE_GET_IRQ_INFO _IOWR(';', 112, struct
> vfio_irq_info)
> +
> +/* Set IRQ eventfds, arg[0] = index, arg[1] = count, arg[2-n] =
> eventfds */
> +#define VFIO_DEVICE_SET_IRQ_EVENTFDS _IOW(';', 113, int)
> +
> +/* Unmask IRQ index, arg[0] = index */
> +#define VFIO_DEVICE_UNMASK_IRQ _IOW(';', 114, int)
> +
> +/* Set unmask eventfd, arg[0] = index, arg[1] = eventfd */
> +#define VFIO_DEVICE_SET_UNMASK_IRQ_EVENTFD _IOW(';', 115, int)
> +
> +#define VFIO_DEVICE_RESET _IO(';', 116)
> +
> +struct vfio_dtpath {
> + __u32 len; /* length of structure */
> + __u32 index;
> + __u64 flags;
> +#define VFIO_DTPATH_FLAGS_REGION (1 << 0)
> +#define VFIO_DTPATH_FLAGS_IRQ (1 << 1)
> + char *path;
> +};
> +#define VFIO_DEVICE_GET_DTPATH _IOWR(';', 117, struct
> vfio_dtpath)
> +
> +struct vfio_dtindex {
> + __u32 len; /* length of structure */
> + __u32 index;
> + __u32 prop_type;
> + __u32 prop_index;
> + __u64 flags;
> +#define VFIO_DTINDEX_FLAGS_REGION (1 << 0)
> +#define VFIO_DTINDEX_FLAGS_IRQ (1 << 1)
> +};
> +#define VFIO_DEVICE_GET_DTINDEX _IOWR(';', 118, struct
> vfio_dtindex)
> +
> +#endif /* VFIO_H */
/Chris
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH] vfio: VFIO Driver core framework, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk, 2011/11/11