qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 11/45] msi: Factor out delivery hook


From: Jan Kiszka
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 11/45] msi: Factor out delivery hook
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 14:23:29 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); de; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080226 SUSE/2.0.0.12-1.1 Thunderbird/2.0.0.12 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666

On 2011-10-18 14:05, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 09:15:47PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2011-10-17 15:43, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 11:27:45AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>> diff --git a/hw/msi.c b/hw/msi.c
>>>> index 3c7ebc3..9055155 100644
>>>> --- a/hw/msi.c
>>>> +++ b/hw/msi.c
>>>> @@ -40,6 +40,14 @@
>>>>  /* Flag for interrupt controller to declare MSI/MSI-X support */
>>>>  bool msi_supported;
>>>>  
>>>> +static void msi_unsupported(MSIMessage *msg)
>>>> +{
>>>> +    /* If we get here, the board failed to register a delivery handler. */
>>>> +    abort();
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +void (*msi_deliver)(MSIMessage *msg) = msi_unsupported;
>>>> +
>>>
>>> How about we set this to NULL, and check it instead of the bool
>>> flag?
>>>
>>
>> Yeah. I will introduce
>>
>> bool msi_supported(void)
>> {
>>     return msi_deliver != msi_unsupported;
>> }
>>
>> OK?
>>
>> Jan
>>
> 
> Looks a bit weird ...
> NULL is a pretty standard value for an invalid pointer, isn't it?

Save us the runtime check and is equally expressive and readable IMHO.

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]