qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V8 08/14] Introduce file lock for the block laye


From: Stefan Berger
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V8 08/14] Introduce file lock for the block layer
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 11:06:42 -0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110621 Fedora/3.1.11-1.fc14 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.11

On 09/07/2011 10:35 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 10:25:08AM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
On 09/07/2011 10:10 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 09:56:52AM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
On 09/07/2011 09:16 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 09:06:05AM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
First: There are two ways to encrypt the data.

One comes with the QCoW2 type of image and it comes for free. Set
the encryption flag when creating the QCoW2 file and one has to
provide a key to access the QCoW2. I found this mode problematic for
users since it required me to go through the monitor every time I
started the VM. Besides that the key is provided so late that all
devices are already initialized and if the wrong key was provided
the only thing the TPM can do is to go into shutdown mode since
there is state on the QCoW2 but it cannot be decrypted. This also
became problematic when doing migrations with libvirt for example
and one was to have a wrong key/password installed on the target
side -- graceful termination of the migration is impossible.
OK let's go back to this for a moment. Add a load
callback, access file there. On failure, return
an error. migration fails gracefully, and
management can retry, or migrate to another node,
or whatever.

What's the problem exactly?


The switch-over from source to destination already happened when the
key is finally passed and you just won't be able to access the QCoW2
in case the key was wrong.
This is exactly what happens with any kind of othe rmigration errror.
So fail migration, and source can get restarted if necessary.

I guess I wanted to improve on this and catch user errors.
If we let migration fail then all you can do is try to terminate the
VM on the destination and cold-start on the source.
No, normally if migration fails VM is not started on destination,
and it can just continue on source.

When I had tried this in conjunction with encrypted QCoW2 the switch-over already had happened and the source had died. So a wrong key on the destination was fatal.
Similar problems occur when you start a
VM with an encrypted QCoW2 image. The monitor will prompt you for
the password and then you start the VM and if the password was wrong
the OS just won't be able to access the image.

    Stefan
Why can't you verify the password?

I do verify the key/password in the TPM driver. If the driver cannot
make sense of the contents of the QCoW2 due to wrong key I simply
put the driver into failure mode. That's all I can do with encrypted
QCoW2.
You can return error from init script which will make qemu exit.

I can return an error code when the front- and backend interfaces are initialized, but that happens really early and the encyrption key entered through the monitor is not available at this point.

I also don't get a notification about when the key was entered. In case of QCoW2 encryption (and migration) I delay initialization until very late, basically when the VM accesses the tpm tis hardware emulation layer again (needs to be done this way I think to support block migration where I cannot even access the block device early on at all). Only then I find out that the key was wrong. I guess any other handling would require blockdev.c's invocation of monitor_read_bdrv_key_start() to be 'somehow' extended and ... do what ? loop until the correct password was entered?

   Stefan
In case of a QCoW2 encrypted VM image it's different. There I guess
the intelligence of what is good and bad data is only inside the OS.

    Stefan




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]