qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] main: switch qemu_set_fd_handler to g_io_ad


From: Avi Kivity
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] main: switch qemu_set_fd_handler to g_io_add_watch
Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 12:46:55 +0300
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110816 Thunderbird/6.0

On 09/04/2011 05:03 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 08/22/2011 04:12 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
This patch changes qemu_set_fd_handler to be implemented in terms of
g_io_add_watch(). The semantics are a bit different so some glue is required.

qemu_set_fd_handler2 is much harder to convert because of its use of polling.

The glib main loop has the major of advantage of having a proven thread safe architecture. By using the glib main loop instead of our own, it will allow us
to eventually introduce multiple I/O threads.

I'm pretty sure that this will work on Win32, but I would appreciate some help testing. I think the semantics of g_io_channel_unix_new() are really just tied
to the notion of a "unix fd" and not necessarily unix itself.

'git bisect' fingered this as responsible for breaking qcow2+cache=unsafe. I think there's an off-by-one here and the guilty patch is the one that switches the main loop, but that's just a guess.

The symptoms are that a guest that is restarted (new qemu process) after install doesn't make it through grub - some image data didn't make it do disk. With qcow2 and cache=unsafe that can easily happen through exit notifiers not being run and the entire qcow2 metadata being thrown out the window. Running with raw+cache=unsafe works.


Upstream appears to work for me... strange.

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]