qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] Build broken


From: Stefan Hajnoczi
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Build broken
Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2011 07:12:44 +0100

On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 5:49 PM, malc <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Aug 2011, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 7:22 AM, malc <address@hidden> wrote:
>> >
>> > /home/malc/x/rcs/git/qemuorg/coroutine-ucontext.c: In function 
>> > 'coroutine_new':
>> > /home/malc/x/rcs/git/qemuorg/coroutine-ucontext.c:160:16: error: 
>> > 'arg.i[1]' may be used uninitialized in this function
>> > /home/malc/x/rcs/git/qemuorg/coroutine-ucontext.c:136:18: note: 'arg.i[1]' 
>> > was declared here
>> >
>> > diff --git a/coroutine-ucontext.c b/coroutine-ucontext.c
>> > index 41c2379..42dc3e2 100644
>> > --- a/coroutine-ucontext.c
>> > +++ b/coroutine-ucontext.c
>> > @@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ static Coroutine *coroutine_new(void)
>> >     CoroutineUContext *co;
>> >     ucontext_t old_uc, uc;
>> >     jmp_buf old_env;
>> > -    union cc_arg arg;
>> > +    union cc_arg arg = {0};
>> >
>> >     /* The ucontext functions preserve signal masks which incurs a system 
>> > call
>> >      * overhead.  setjmp()/longjmp() does not preserve signal masks but 
>> > only
>> >
>> > I guess gcc should yell not only here on ppc32 but on any machine where
>> > pointer size is less than the size of two ints.
>>
>> Makes sense.  Are you going to commit a fix or send a signed-off-by patch?
>>
>
> If the author(s)(you and Kevin? just you?) agree with the above i can just
> push it.

The change makes sense to me.

Kevin?

Stefan



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]