qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] monitor: HMP: fix consecutive integer expressio


From: Anthony Liguori
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] monitor: HMP: fix consecutive integer expression parsing
Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2011 16:08:50 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110516 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10

On 08/05/2011 03:39 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 4:51 PM, Anthony Liguori<address@hidden>  wrote:
On 08/03/2011 06:57 AM, Alon Levy wrote:

Currently a command that takes two consecutive integer operations, like
client_migrate_info, will be incorrectly parsed by the human monitor if
the second expression begins with a minus ('-') or plus ('+') sign:

client_migrate_info<protocol>    <hostname>    <port>    <tls-port>
client_migrate_info spice localhost 5900 -1
=>    port = 5899 = 5900 - 1
    tls-port = -1
But expected by the user to be:
    port = 5900
    tls-port = -1

The fix is that for any required integer (ilM) expression followed by
another
integer expression (ilM) the first expression will be parsed by expr_unary
instead of expr_sum. So you can still use arithmetic, but you have to
enclose
it in parenthesis:

Command line | Old parsed result | With patch result
(1+1) 2      | 2, 2              | 2, 2
1 -1         | 0, -1             | 1, -1
The rest are bizarre but not any worse then before
1+2+3        | 6, 5              | 1, 5
(1+2)+3      | 3, 3              | 3, 3

I vote for just removing the expression parsing entirely.  It's incredibly
non-intuitive and I don't think anyone really uses it.

Does anyone strongly object?

I think the expressions would be useful with memory addresses, like
"xp/i $pc-4", but I usually start GDB in these cases. Can we disable
the expressions only for ports?

Not sure what you mean by ports. You mean for anything but vc? My goal in disabling the expressions would be to simplify the parsing by removing all that messy code.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]