qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] scsi-generic: Remove bogus double complete


From: Kevin Wolf
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] scsi-generic: Remove bogus double complete
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2011 16:00:00 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101027 Fedora/3.0.10-1.fc12 Thunderbird/3.0.10

Am 05.04.2011 07:07, schrieb David Gibson:
> From: Ben Herrenschmidt <address@hidden>
> 
> scsi-generic scsi_read_complete() should not -both- call the client
> complete callback with SCSI_REASON_DATA -and- call
> scsi_command_complete().  The former will cause the client to queue a
> new read or write request, while the later will free the request data
> structure, thus causing the new read or write request to use a
> freed/stale structure when it completes.
> 
> This patch fixes the bug, fixing a crash with scsi-generic & RHEL5.5
> installer.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <address@hidden>
> Signed-off-by: David Gibson <address@hidden>
> ---
>  hw/scsi-generic.c |    2 --
>  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/scsi-generic.c b/hw/scsi-generic.c
> index 9be1cca..c06f5df 100644
> --- a/hw/scsi-generic.c
> +++ b/hw/scsi-generic.c
> @@ -173,8 +173,6 @@ static void scsi_read_complete(void * opaque, int ret)
>  
>      r->len = -1;
>      r->req.bus->complete(r->req.bus, SCSI_REASON_DATA, r->req.tag, len);
> -    if (len == 0)
> -        scsi_command_complete(r, 0);
>  }
>  
>  /* Read more data from scsi device into buffer.  */

I have a hard time each time I try to understand this SCSI stuff without
reading a lot of code and specs. What I would have expected is this:

if (len == 0) {
    scsi_command_complete(r, 0);
} else {
    r->req.bus->complete(r->req.bus, SCSI_REASON_DATA, r->req.tag, len);
}

This would fix the problem that both functions are called, but still use
SCSI_REASON_DONE if no data is transferred. This is similar to what
scsi-disk seems to be doing. However, if you can explain to me why your
version is more correct, I'll gladly take it.

Kevin



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]