[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] checkpatch.pl: warn on C99 comments, but don't fail
From: |
Stefan Hajnoczi |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] checkpatch.pl: warn on C99 comments, but don't fail |
Date: |
Fri, 1 Apr 2011 18:01:51 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 11:55:39AM -0500, Michael Roth wrote:
> I'd prefer to only document "strict" guidelines, and treat
> checkpatch.pl warnings ("suggestions") as an extra "reward" you get
> for taking the time to run it.
I don't want to be punished for running checkpatch.pl like I'm supposed
to while those who don't can get away with more.
A --pedantic mode would be fine although probably no one besides the
author would use it :).
The stuff that gets reported by the default invocation needs to matter,
otherwise checkpatch.pl isn't useful and people will bypass it.
Stefan
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] checkpatch.pl: make C99 comments a warning, not error, (continued)
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] checkpatch.pl: add --no-fail-on-warn option, Michael Roth, 2011/04/01
- Re: [Qemu-devel] checkpatch.pl: warn on C99 comments, but don't fail, Peter Maydell, 2011/04/01
- Re: [Qemu-devel] checkpatch.pl: warn on C99 comments, but don't fail, Stefan Hajnoczi, 2011/04/01
- Re: [Qemu-devel] checkpatch.pl: warn on C99 comments, but don't fail, Peter Maydell, 2011/04/01
- Re: [Qemu-devel] checkpatch.pl: warn on C99 comments, but don't fail, Michael Roth, 2011/04/01
- Re: [Qemu-devel] checkpatch.pl: warn on C99 comments, but don't fail, Peter Maydell, 2011/04/01
- Re: [Qemu-devel] checkpatch.pl: warn on C99 comments, but don't fail, Michael Roth, 2011/04/01
- Re: [Qemu-devel] checkpatch.pl: warn on C99 comments, but don't fail,
Stefan Hajnoczi <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] checkpatch.pl: warn on C99 comments, but don't fail, Michael Roth, 2011/04/01
- Re: [Qemu-devel] checkpatch.pl: warn on C99 comments, but don't fail, Stefan Hajnoczi, 2011/04/02