qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] QCFG: a new mechanism to replace QemuOpts and opt


From: Anthony Liguori
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] QCFG: a new mechanism to replace QemuOpts and option handling
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 08:56:58 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110223 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.8

On 03/15/2011 08:45 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 15.03.2011 14:27, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
On 03/15/2011 05:09 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
5) Very complex data types can be implemented.  We had some discussion
of supporting nested structures with -blockdev.  This wouldn't work with
QemuOpts but I've already implemented it with QCFG (blockdev syntax is
my test case right now).  The syntax I'm currently using is -blockdev
cache=none,id=foo,format.qcow.protocol.nbd.hostname=localhost where '.'
is used to reference sub structures.
Do you have an example from your implementation for this?
It's not exhaustive as I'm only using this for testing but here's what
I've been working with:

{ 'type': 'ProbeProtocol', 'data': { 'unsafe': 'bool', 'filename': 'str' } }

{ 'type': 'FileProtocol', 'data': { 'filename': 'str' } }

{ 'type': 'HostDeviceProtocol', 'data': { 'device': 'str' } }

{ 'type': 'NbdProtocol', 'data': { 'hostname': 'str', 'port': 'int' } }

{ 'union': 'BlockdevProtocol',
    'data': { 'probe': 'ProbeProtocol', 'file': 'FileProtocol',
              'host-dev': 'HostDeviceProtocol', 'nbd': 'NbdProtocol' } }
What would this look like in the generated C code? A union of
differently typed pointers?

Yes:

typedef enum BlockdevFormatKind {
    BFK_PROBE = 0,
    BFK_RAW = 1,
    BFK_QCOW2 = 2,
    BFK_QED = 3,
} BlockdevFormatKind;

typedef struct BlockdevFormat {
    BlockdevFormatKind kind;
    union {
        struct ProbeFormat * probe;
        struct RawFormat * raw;
        struct Qcow2Format * qcow2;
        struct QedFormat * qed;
    };
    struct BlockdevFormat * next;
} BlockdevFormat;

Are format drivers still contained in a single C file in block/ that is
enabled just by compiling it in or does the block layer now have to know
about all available drivers and the options they provide?

Yes, everything is contained within a single file. In terms of build dependencies, it's really just a call about what matters to you. You can have the block open take a BlockdevFormat which means the block layer doesn't need to know about specific formats.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

This is probably the most complex thing you can get, so I think it would
make a better example than a VNC configuration.
Yup, that's been what I've been using to prototype all of this.  I
didn't it in the mail because it's rather complex :-)
This is exactly what makes it interesting. :-)

Kevin





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]