qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH v3 uq/master 00/22] Win32 iothread support


From: Marcelo Tosatti
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH v3 uq/master 00/22] Win32 iothread support
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 16:42:23 -0300
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 04:36:34PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 08:03:42PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > On 2011-03-02 19:43, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 02:35:56PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > >> On 02/28/2011 04:05 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > >>> On 02/28/2011 01:13 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> If there's a git tree of this I'll be happy to do an autotest run.
> > >>>
> > >>> Sure, it's branch iothread-win32 of git://github.com/bonzini/qemu.git
> > >>
> > >> Fails on Fedora 9 i386 install, hangs right after "Performing post
> > >> install configuration...".  The guest is processing interrupts but
> > >> the mouse won't move, and it doesn't make progress.
> > >>
> > >> Configured with --enable-io-thread.  Perhaps the problem exists even
> > >> before the patchset.
> > > 
> > > Probably unrelated, looks similar to the regression seen with qemu-kvm.
> > > 
> > 
> > Do these patches change some behavior or not? 
> 
> Yes, they change some behaviour. Autotest fails.

Sorry, i misunderstood. I don't think these patches change any
behaviour.

Avi's failure case is similar to what i've seen earlier upon
qemu->qemu-kvm merge. Conclusion is there is no new regression 
introduced by these patches.

> 
> > Is it this same effect you saw with my qemu-kvm queue?
> 
> Yes.
> 



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]