qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 7/7] ahci: work around bug with level interrupts


From: Alexander Graf
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 7/7] ahci: work around bug with level interrupts
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 18:10:56 +0100

On 01.02.2011, at 18:06, Aurelien Jarno wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 05:53:43PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> 
>> On 01.02.2011, at 17:34, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> 
>>> On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 03:51:32PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>> When using level based interrupts, the interrupt is treated the same as an
>>>> edge triggered one: leaving the line up does not retrigger the interrupt.
>>>> 
>>>> In fact, when not lowering the line, we won't ever get a new interrupt 
>>>> inside
>>>> the guest. So let's always retrigger an interrupt as soon as the OS ack'ed
>>>> something on the device. This way we're sure the guest doesn't starve on
>>>> interrupts until someone fixes the actual interrupt path.
>>> 
>>> Given this issue mostly concerns x86 and not other architectures where
>>> the SATA emulation can probably be used, what about putting the two
>>> versions of the codes like in i8259.c:
>>> 
>>> | * all targets should do this rather than acking the IRQ in the cpu */
>>> | #if defined(TARGET_MIPS) || defined(TARGET_PPC) || defined(TARGET_ALPHA)
>>> 
>>> The list of architectures here is reduced given the few architectures 
>>> that actually use the i8259, so for ahci.c it should probably be #if not
>>> defined(TARGET_I386) instead.
>> 
>> Because then we'd have to build the ahci code conditionally on the 
>> architecture. Right now it builds into libhw :)
> 
> If we want to keep it in libhw, it's probably better to disable it on
> other architectures than i386.

How so? The workaround simply triggers a superfluous interrupt event, but 
shouldn't break anything for other architectures. In fact, last time I checked 
it worked just fine on ppc.


Alex




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]