qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] Correct use of ! and &


From: Aurelien Jarno
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] Correct use of ! and &
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 13:59:28 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)

On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 11:25:51PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 10:05:11PM +0000, Blue Swirl wrote:
> > Combining bitwise AND and logical NOT is suspicious.
> > 
> > Fixed by this Coccinelle script:
> > // From http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/646367
> > @@ expression E1,E2; @@
> > (
> >   !E1 & !E2
> > |
> > - !E1 & E2
> > + !(E1 & E2)
> > )
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Blue Swirl <address@hidden>
> > ---
> >  target-sh4/helper.c |    4 ++--
> >  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/target-sh4/helper.c b/target-sh4/helper.c
> > index 2343366..c6af959 100644
> > --- a/target-sh4/helper.c
> > +++ b/target-sh4/helper.c
> > @@ -380,7 +380,7 @@ static int get_mmu_address(CPUState * env,
> > target_ulong * physical,
> >                      MMU_DTLB_VIOLATION_READ;
> >              } else if ((rw == 1) && !(matching->pr & 1)) {
> >                  n = MMU_DTLB_VIOLATION_WRITE;
> > -            } else if ((rw == 1) & !matching->d) {
> > +            } else if (!(matching->d & (rw == 1))) {
> 
> Here, we really want to do a logical comparison, so && is probably
> better. Note however that matching->d is a single bit so the code is
> doing what it is supposed to do.
> 
> >                  n = MMU_DTLB_INITIAL_WRITE;
> >              } else {
> >                  *prot = PAGE_READ;
> > @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ static int get_physical_address(CPUState * env,
> > target_ulong * physical,
> >      }
> > 
> >      /* If MMU is disabled, return the corresponding physical page */
> > -    if (!env->mmucr & MMUCR_AT) {
> > +    if (!(env->mmucr & MMUCR_AT)) {
> >     *physical = address & 0x1FFFFFFF;
> >     *prot = PAGE_READ | PAGE_WRITE | PAGE_EXEC;
> >     return MMU_OK;
> 
> This one is correct.
> 
> Thanks for spotting these issues.
> 

I have just committed a patch to fix them.

-- 
Aurelien Jarno                          GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
address@hidden                 http://www.aurel32.net



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]