[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] PCI: Bus number from the bridge, not the de
From: |
Michael S. Tsirkin |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] PCI: Bus number from the bridge, not the device |
Date: |
Tue, 14 Dec 2010 06:57:15 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 09:49:21PM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 06:46 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 01:04:23PM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 13:22 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 03:53:11PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > > > > pcibus_dev_print() was erroneously retrieving the device bus
> > > > > number from the secondary bus number offset of the device
> > > > > instead of the bridge above the device. This ends of landing
> > > > > in the 2nd byte of the 3rd BAR for devices, which thankfully
> > > > > is usually zero. pcibus_get_dev_path() copied this code,
> > > > > inheriting the same bug. pcibus_get_dev_path() is used for
> > > > > ramblock naming, so changing it can effect migration. However,
> > > > > I've only seen this byte be non-zero for an assigned device,
> > > > > which can't migrate anyway, so hopefully we won't run into
> > > > > any issues.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <address@hidden>
> > > >
> > > > Good catch. Applied.
> > >
> > > Um... submitted vs applied:
> > >
> > > PCI: Bus number from the bridge, not the device
> > >
> > > @@ -6,20 +8,28 @@
> > > number from the secondary bus number offset of the device
> > > instead of the bridge above the device. This ends of landing
> > > in the 2nd byte of the 3rd BAR for devices, which thankfully
> > > - is usually zero. pcibus_get_dev_path() copied this code,
> > > + is usually zero.
> > > +
> > > + Note: pcibus_get_dev_path() copied this code,
> > > inheriting the same bug. pcibus_get_dev_path() is used for
> > > ramblock naming, so changing it can effect migration. However,
> > > I've only seen this byte be non-zero for an assigned device,
> > > which can't migrate anyway, so hopefully we won't run into
> > > any issues.
> > >
> > > + This patch does not touch pcibus_get_dev_path, as
> > > + bus number is guest assigned for nested buses,
> > > + so using it for migration is broken anyway.
> > > + Fix it properly later.
> > > +
> > > Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <address@hidden>
> > > + Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden>
> > >
> > > diff --git a/hw/pci.c b/hw/pci.c
> > > -index 6d0934d..15416dd 100644
> > > +index 962886e..8f6fcf8 100644
> > > --- a/hw/pci.c
> > > +++ b/hw/pci.c
> > > -@@ -1940,8 +1940,7 @@ static void pcibus_dev_print(Monitor *mon,
> > > DeviceState *dev, int indent)
> > > +@@ -1806,8 +1806,7 @@ static void pcibus_dev_print(Monitor *mon,
> > > DeviceState *dev, int indent)
> > >
> > > monitor_printf(mon, "%*sclass %s, addr %02x:%02x.%x, "
> > > "pci id %04x:%04x (sub %04x:%04x)\n",
> > > @@ -29,14 +39,3 @@
> > > PCI_SLOT(d->devfn), PCI_FUNC(d->devfn),
> > > pci_get_word(d->config + PCI_VENDOR_ID),
> > > pci_get_word(d->config + PCI_DEVICE_ID),
> > > -@@ -1965,7 +1964,7 @@ static char *pcibus_get_dev_path(DeviceState *dev)
> > > - char path[16];
> > > -
> > > - snprintf(path, sizeof(path), "%04x:%02x:%02x.%x",
> > > -- pci_find_domain(d->bus), d->config[PCI_SECONDARY_BUS],
> > > -+ pci_find_domain(d->bus), pci_bus_num(d->bus),
> > > - PCI_SLOT(d->devfn), PCI_FUNC(d->devfn));
> > > -
> > > - return strdup(path);
> > > -
> > > -
> > >
> > > So the chunk that fixed the part that I was actually interested in got
> > > dropped even though the existing code is clearly wrong. Yes, we still
> > > have issues with nested bridges (not that we have many of those), but
> > > until the "Fix it properly later" part comes along, can we please
> > > include the obvious bug fix? Thanks,
> > >
> > > Alex
> >
> > We can stick 0 in there - would that help? I would much rather not
> > create a version where we put the bus number there.
>
> Yep, 0 is good enough until we solve the nested bridge problem. Thanks,
>
> Alex
I'm surprised you see that it matters in practice, but ok.
Like this?
diff --git a/hw/pci.c b/hw/pci.c
index 254647b..81231c5 100644
--- a/hw/pci.c
+++ b/hw/pci.c
@@ -1952,7 +1952,10 @@ static char *pcibus_get_dev_path(DeviceState *dev)
char path[16];
snprintf(path, sizeof(path), "%04x:%02x:%02x.%x",
- pci_find_domain(d->bus), d->config[PCI_SECONDARY_BUS],
+ pci_find_domain(d->bus),
+ 0 /* TODO: need a persistent path for nested buses.
+ * Note: pci_bus_num(d->bus) is not right as it's guest
+ * assigned. */,
PCI_SLOT(d->devfn), PCI_FUNC(d->devfn));
return strdup(path);
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] PCI: Bus number from the bridge, not the device, Alex Williamson, 2010/12/13
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] PCI: Bus number from the bridge, not the device, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2010/12/13
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] PCI: Bus number from the bridge, not the device, Alex Williamson, 2010/12/13
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] PCI: Bus number from the bridge, not the device,
Michael S. Tsirkin <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] PCI: Bus number from the bridge, not the device, Alex Williamson, 2010/12/14
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] PCI: Bus number from the bridge, not the device, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2010/12/14
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] PCI: Bus number from the bridge, not the device, Alex Williamson, 2010/12/14
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] PCI: Bus number from the bridge, not the device, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2010/12/15
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] PCI: Bus number from the bridge, not the device, Alex Williamson, 2010/12/15
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] PCI: Bus number from the bridge, not the device, Isaku Yamahata, 2010/12/16
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] PCI: Bus number from the bridge, not the device, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2010/12/16
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] PCI: Bus number from the bridge, not the device, Isaku Yamahata, 2010/12/21
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] PCI: Bus number from the bridge, not the device, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2010/12/21