[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Qemu-devel] Re: Which qemu ports actually work?
From: |
Torbjorn Granlund |
Subject: |
[Qemu-devel] Re: Which qemu ports actually work? |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Oct 2010 23:11:27 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.3 (berkeley-unix) |
Stefan Weil <address@hidden> writes:
No, you need newer version of qemu, for example version 0.13.0
That's the version I am using:
king# qemu -version
QEMU emulator version 0.13.0, Copyright (c) 2003-2008 Fabrice Bellard
kqemu was replaced by kvm support (at least for some platforms).
Are you talking about the FreeBSD kernel now and not the kernel Linux?
(I have a poor understanding of what the various components do, such as
kqemu and kvm. Is there a good, accurate and quite detailed text about
this, that I could read?)
As far as I know, there should be kvm support for FreeBSD, too,
but I must admit that I rarely use kvm: for most guests
which you listed neither kqemu nor kvm will be useable.
Both only improve host architecture = guest architecture
scenarios.
I realise that.
--
Torbjörn
Re: [Qemu-devel] Which qemu ports actually work?, Stefan Weil, 2010/10/26
Re: [Qemu-devel] Which qemu ports actually work?, Blue Swirl, 2010/10/26
Re: [Qemu-devel] Which qemu targets actually work? (was: Which qemu ports actually work?), Andreas Färber, 2010/10/26