Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Problem with virtio

[Frans de Boer]

On 09/20/2010 11:19 PM, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 22:22 +0200, Frans de Boer wrote:
>   
>> On 09/20/2010 07:46 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>     
>>> On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 11:13:16PM +0200, Frans de Boer wrote:
>>>   
>>>       
>>>> On 09/19/2010 05:53 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>>>
>>>>     On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 11:13:12PM +0200, Frans de Boer wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         On 09/17/2010 10:10 AM, Frans de Boer wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>             On 09/17/2010 01:40 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                 On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 23:49:51 +0200
>>>>                 Frans de Boer <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                     Dear reader,
>>>>
>>>>                     Using qemu-kvm-0.13-rc1 and having the boot partition 
>>>> as if=virtio,
>>>>                     causes the attached blue screen when booting Windows 
>>>> XP SP3.
>>>>                     Changing the interface to ide (if=ide) and the system 
>>>> boots normal.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                 Do you have the virtio drivers installed?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>             Yes, everything is working fine when I use the 0.12.5 release.
>>>>             Before you ask, I am using the git repository too. Same effect.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         No suggestions form anyone?
>>>>         Again, any compile combination is working under 0.12.5. Starting 
>>>> with
>>>>         0.13-rc0/1 the virtio option for the boot disk is not working 
>>>> anymore.
>>>>
>>>>         Frans.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     Could you try bisecting please?
>>>>     git bisect start v0.13.0-rc0 v0.12.0
>>>>
>>>>     will start the bisect process, then you build, test and run
>>>>     git bisect good/git bisect bad as appropriate to get the
>>>>     new version.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Following your advice, I noticed that the system could not boot when I use 
>>>> the
>>>> guest virtio driver. I then switch back to as far as  version 10.0 with the
>>>> same bad result. I then remembered that in the past I used the '.raw' 
>>>> format.
>>>> Since I am using the qcow2 format (better performance), I never tried 
>>>> if=virtio
>>>> for the disk before until I use the 0.13.0-rc1 version. I tried the 
>>>> release tar
>>>> file of 0.12.5 and this time with the guest virtio driver, with the same 
>>>> bad
>>>> result.
>>>> Maybe it is the file format? Maybe the virtio disk driver? I have taken the
>>>> virtio drivers from the KVM website.
>>>>
>>>>         
> Please try this one 
> http://people.redhat.com/vrozenfe/VioStorXp32.tar.gz
> Cheers,
> Vadim.
>   
>>>> Frans.
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>> I got confused, sorry. Let's try to enumerate what works and what does not.
>>> Could you tell us which of the following combinations you tried
>>> and with what result (works/doesn't)?
>>>
>>> - virtio + raw + 0.12
>>> - virtio + qcow2 + 0.12
>>> - ide + qcow2 + 0.12
>>>
>>> - virtio + raw + 0.13
>>> - virtio + qcow2 + 0.13
>>> - ide + qcow2 + 0.13
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>>   
>>>       
>> I used 0.12.5 (git and tarball) and the 0.13-rc1 (git and tarball)
>>
>> - virtio + raw + 0.12                ok
>> - virtio + qcow2 + 0.12              fail!
>> - ide + qcow2 + 0.12         ok
>>
>> - virtio + raw + 0.13                fail!
>> - virtio + qcow2 + 0.13              fail!
>> - ide + qcow2 + 0.13         ok
>>
>> Frans.
>>     
The new list is:

- virtio + raw + 0.13           ok.

That is when I am using this viostor driver:
  http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/virtio-win/latest/images/bin/
I used the complete ISO file and extracted the viostor files. These are 6.x 
files.

.qcow2 with virtio still does not work under 0.13-rc1
It's late, so maybe in a few days I try 0.12.5 with the .qcow2 format.

By the way, above ISO file contains much more virtio goodies not supplied yet 
at the KVM or QEMU site. Maybe an upgrade at the site is in order?

Frans.