Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [libvirt] Libvirt debug API

[Avi Kivity]

On 04/26/2010 04:43 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> The reason I lean toward the direct launch model is that it gives the 
> user a lot of flexibility in terms of using things like namespaces, 
> DAC, cgroups, capabilities, etc.  A lot of potential features are lost 
> when you do indirect launch because you have to teach the daemon how 
> to support each of these features.

But what's the alternative?  Teach the user how to do all these things?

It's infinitely flexible, but it's not an API you can give to a 
management tool developer.

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function