qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] tcg-hppa finish, v4


From: Aurelien Jarno
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] tcg-hppa finish, v4
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 11:36:21 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)

On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 04:29:11PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 04/07/2010 04:56 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > Sorry, I haven't find time to review it in details. Would also be nice
> > if someone can try it on an hppa machine, and ack it.
> 
> I got an ack against v3 here:
> 
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2010-03/msg01214.html
> 
> This isn't just written to a spec, I do have access to an hppa machine:
> 
> address@hidden:~$ cat /proc/cpuinfo 
> processor     : 0
> cpu family    : PA-RISC 2.0
> cpu           : PA8600 (PCX-W+)
> cpu MHz               : 552.000000
> model         : 9000/785/J6000
> model name    : Duet W+
> hversion      : 0x00005d40
> sversion      : 0x00000491
> I-cache               : 512 KB
> D-cache               : 1024 KB (WB, direct mapped)
> ITLB entries  : 160
> DTLB entries  : 160 - shared with ITLB
> bogomips      : 1101.00
> software id   : 2011956991
> 
> Test results for linux-user-test-0.3:
> 
> ok:   i386 arm armeb sparc ppc mips mipsel
> bad:  sparc32plus ppc64abi32 sh4 sh4eb x86_64
>
> Of course, sparc32plus doesn't work on an i386 host either -- I think
> the implementation of fstat is wrong.
> 
> I don't have any system emulations set up on the hppa machine yet.
> 

It might be really interesting to also test qemu-system, as it usually 
catches a lot more bugs. This is especially given that your patch
changes system emulation only parts.

-- 
Aurelien Jarno                          GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
address@hidden                 http://www.aurel32.net




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]