[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Qemu-devel] KVM developer call minutes (Jan 12)
From: |
Chris Wright |
Subject: |
[Qemu-devel] KVM developer call minutes (Jan 12) |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Jan 2010 08:50:52 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) |
Attendees: Avi, Dor, Gleb, Michael, Chris, Juan, John, Kevin, Armbru, Amit,
Anthony, Glauber, AlexW, AlexG, Luiz, Jes
Minutes (please reply w/ corrections or follow-ups):
- administrivia
- no plan to do formal attendance
- above attendance list is approximate
- discussion focused on issues relevant to KVM upstream development
- will try recording the call
- will produce minutes
- qemu 0.13 kvm feature merge issues
- looking for post-mortem analysis on what worked and didn't for 0.12 release
- need harder policy re: feature freeze
- Is a longer release cycle OK? Planning for June 1 (6 month vs 3 month)
- no real objections
- what about the version? are we ready for 1.0?
- going to 1.0 makes sense if we can merge KVM support
- mtloop (from malc) vs i/o thread
- SIGALRM vs. select() timeout
- SMP changes
- drop current patchset
- irqchip conversion
- need to move to normal main loop, instead of KVM specific main loop
- eventfd, signalfd, etc..
- compatibility across platforms is complicated
- either drop use of signalfd, or create higher-level abstraction
- higher-level abstraction makes most sense
- common mechnaism for vcpu locking, vcpu thread launching, etc. for
device model threading
- live migration in the I/O thread is showing performance limitation
- need some more release sync w/ qemu and kvm
- different developer and user bases
- lots of feedback from KVM users when qemu-kvm rebases
- Avi considering restarting snapshot releases
- already doing regular weekly (or more often for invasive features)
merges w/ qemu.git
- unclear there's antything that needs to be done here
- will qemu-kvm deprecate IA-64?
- no need to actively remove unless it is in the way or gets to the
point that it is hopelessly broken
- vhost-net todo's
- more patch review needed
- some concern about security implications re: socket binding to qemu
- needs more eyes
- current version supports level interrupts
- anyone interested in working on DMA offloading w/ engine like IOAT
- possible to expose DMA engine to guest in virtio?
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Qemu-devel] KVM developer call minutes (Jan 12),
Chris Wright <=