qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] tcg conditional set, round 4


From: Laurent Desnogues
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] tcg conditional set, round 4
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 15:46:00 +0100

On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 1:02 AM, Richard Henderson <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 12/21/2009 03:08 PM, Laurent Desnogues wrote:
>>
>> If you wanted to use movcond, you'd have to make
>> cond + move a special case...
>
> You'd certainly want the ARM front-end to use movcond more often than that.
>  For instance:
>
>  addeq r1,r2,r3
> -->
>  add_i32 tmp,r2,r3
>  movcond_i32 r1,ZF,0,tmp,r1,eq
>
> You'd want to continue to use a branch around if the instruction has side
> effects like cpu fault (e.g. load, store) or updating flags.
>
> It ought not be very hard to arrange for something like
>
>  if (cond != 0xe) {
>    if (may_use_movcond(insn)) {
>      s->condlabel = -1;
>      /* Save the true destination register.  */
>      s->conddest = cpu_R[dest];
>      /* Implement the instruction into a temporary.  */
>      cpu_R[dest] = tcg_temp_new();
>    } else {
>      s->condlabel = gen_new_label();
>      ArmConditional cmp = gen_test_cc(cond ^ 1);
>      tcg_gen_brcondi_i32(cmp.cond, cmp.reg, 0, s->condlabel);
>    }
>    s->condjmp = 1;
>  }
>
>  // ... implement the instruction as we currently do.
>
>  if (s->condjmp) {
>    if (s->condlabel == -1) {
>      /* Conditionally move the temporary result into the
>         true destination register.  */
>      ArmConditional cmp = gen_test_cc(cond);
>      tcg_gen_movcond_i32(cmp.cond, s->conddest, cmp.reg, 0,
>                          cpu_R[dest], s->conddest);
>      tcg_temp_free(cpu_R[dest]);
>      /* Restore the true destination register.  */
>      cpu_R[dest] = s->conddest;
>    } else {
>      tcg_set_label(d->condlabel);
>    }
>  }

I agree, that looks nice.  But I'll let you dig into ARM instruction
encoding and see how to implement may_use_movcond and
getting the correct dest to save is not that cheap (and before
you get back to me, yes, you could only consider a small
subset of the instructions for which you want to do that :-).

There's a point I have kept on insisting on that you keep on
not answering :-)  How does all of that perform in practice?
We can discuss forever, as long as it isn't measured, we are
just guessing.


Laurent




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]