[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Proper support for PCI-based option rom loading (was Re: [Qemu-devel
From: |
Gleb Natapov |
Subject: |
Re: Proper support for PCI-based option rom loading (was Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: qdev property bug?) |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Dec 2009 16:18:49 +0200 |
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 04:15:16PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 04:17:11PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 09:12:21AM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 03:52:34PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > I am mostly concerned with migrating between qemu versions with
> > > > different roms, while guest was in the middle of running ROM.
> > > > This might be solved if we migrated ROM content together with
> > > > the device and put some padding in ROM content so that
> > > > size can be kept constant.
> > >
> > > SeaBIOS will always copy the roms into the 0xc0000-0xf0000 memory area
> > > (regardless of CONFIG_OPTIONROMS_DEPLOYED). So, if one migrates a
> > > machine while running a rom, the memory holding the rom should get
> > > migrated with everything else.
> > >
> > Yes, but if migration happens in the middle of the copying...
>
> Yes. This is not a new bug though.
>
How so?
--
Gleb.
- Re: Proper support for PCI-based option rom loading (was Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: qdev property bug?), (continued)
- Re: Proper support for PCI-based option rom loading (was Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: qdev property bug?), Gerd Hoffmann, 2009/12/15
- Re: Proper support for PCI-based option rom loading (was Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: qdev property bug?), Gerd Hoffmann, 2009/12/15
- Re: Proper support for PCI-based option rom loading (was Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: qdev property bug?), Anthony Liguori, 2009/12/15
- Re: Proper support for PCI-based option rom loading (was Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: qdev property bug?), Gerd Hoffmann, 2009/12/16
- Re: Proper support for PCI-based option rom loading (was Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: qdev property bug?), Michael S. Tsirkin, 2009/12/16
- Re: Proper support for PCI-based option rom loading (was Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: qdev property bug?), Gerd Hoffmann, 2009/12/16
- Re: Proper support for PCI-based option rom loading (was Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: qdev property bug?), Michael S. Tsirkin, 2009/12/16
- Re: Proper support for PCI-based option rom loading (was Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: qdev property bug?), Kevin O'Connor, 2009/12/16
- Re: Proper support for PCI-based option rom loading (was Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: qdev property bug?), Gleb Natapov, 2009/12/16
- Re: Proper support for PCI-based option rom loading (was Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: qdev property bug?), Michael S. Tsirkin, 2009/12/16
- Re: Proper support for PCI-based option rom loading (was Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: qdev property bug?),
Gleb Natapov <=
- Re: Proper support for PCI-based option rom loading (was Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: qdev property bug?), Michael S. Tsirkin, 2009/12/16
- Re: Proper support for PCI-based option rom loading (was Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: qdev property bug?), Gleb Natapov, 2009/12/16
- Re: Proper support for PCI-based option rom loading (was Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: qdev property bug?), Michael S. Tsirkin, 2009/12/16
- Re: Proper support for PCI-based option rom loading (was Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: qdev property bug?), Michael S. Tsirkin, 2009/12/16
- Re: Proper support for PCI-based option rom loading (was Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: qdev property bug?), Anthony Liguori, 2009/12/15
- Re: Proper support for PCI-based option rom loading (was Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: qdev property bug?), Michael S. Tsirkin, 2009/12/15
- Re: Proper support for PCI-based option rom loading (was Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: qdev property bug?), Anthony Liguori, 2009/12/15
- Re: Proper support for PCI-based option rom loading (was Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: qdev property bug?), Chris Wright, 2009/12/15
- Re: Proper support for PCI-based option rom loading (was Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: qdev property bug?), Anthony Liguori, 2009/12/15
- Re: Proper support for PCI-based option rom loading (was Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: qdev property bug?), Kevin O'Connor, 2009/12/15