[Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] qemu-kvm: fix segfault when running kvm without /dev/kvm, falling back to non-accelerated mode

[Mark McLoughlin]

On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 19:18 -0300, Glauber Costa wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 6:48 PM, Dustin Kirkland<address@hidden> wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 3:01 PM, Mark McLoughlin<address@hidden> wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 12:31 -0500, Dustin Kirkland wrote:
> >>> qemu-kvm: fix segfault when running kvm without /dev/kvm, falling back
> >>> to non-accelerated mode
> >>>
> >>> We're seeing segfaults on systems without access to /dev/kvm.  It
> >>> looks like the global kvm_allowed is being set just a little too late
> >>> in vl.c.  This patch moves the kvm initialization a bit higher in the
> >>> vl.c main, just after options processing, and solves the segfaults.
> >>> We're carrying this patch in Ubuntu 9.10 Alpha.  Please apply
> >>> upstream, or advise if and why this might not be the optimal solution.
> >>
> >> Ah discussion about an alternative fix for this fizzled out recently:
> >>
> >>  http://www.mail-archive.com/address@hidden/msg19890.html
> >
> > Ah, thanks Mark.  In that thread, I found Daniel's suggestion the most
> > reasonable, and user-friendly:
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Daniel P. Berrange<address@hidden> wrote:
> >> Well, we could go for logic like:
> >>
> >>  * No arg given          => try kvm, try kqemu, try tcg
> >>  * --accelmode arg given => try $arg, and fail if unavailable
> >>
> >> then libvirt would simply always supply --accelmode for all VMs,
> >> while people running qemu manually would get best available
> I sent some patches to do that, but they were incomplete, and I was
> preempted by something else.
> If you want, you can wait for my cycles to come back, or pick from where I 
> left

In the meantime, can we commit to stable-0.11 either Dustin's fix or
this:

  http://git.et.redhat.com/?p=qemu-fedora.git;a=commitdiff;h=aa1620047b

Cheers,
Mark.