qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 6/7] Set slots more carefully


From: Alexander Graf
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 6/7] Set slots more carefully
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 15:53:39 +0200


On 17.07.2009, at 15:48, Jan Kiszka wrote:

Alexander Graf wrote:
KVM only supports slot sizes of PAGE_SIZE granilarity. On PPC the OS
sets the framebuffer to some odd size though, causing the current code
to simply abort().

So let's bet graceful here. We can just allocate memory sizes that are of PAGE_SIZE granularity and everything that exceeds that comes in as MMIO and
gets handled too - just slower.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <address@hidden>
---
kvm-all.c |    2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kvm-all.c b/kvm-all.c
index 961fa32..60b76cf 100644
--- a/kvm-all.c
+++ b/kvm-all.c
@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ static int kvm_set_user_memory_region(KVMState *s, KVMSlot *slot)

    mem.slot = slot->slot;
    mem.guest_phys_addr = slot->start_addr;
-    mem.memory_size = slot->memory_size;
+    mem.memory_size = slot->memory_size & ~(TARGET_PAGE_SIZE - 1);

TARGET_PAGE_MASK? And I bet you want to round up here...


Eh - yeah. Same thing, no?

And no, I don't want to round up. After the memory backed slot could easily be real MMIO space. I had such strange configurations with the ESCC overlapping in the same page as graphic memory once.

Better be safe than sorry.

Does the caller use the odd size consistently (i.e. also for dirty log
enable/disable)? Otherwise we may run into troubles while looking up
that slot as it will be registered in user space via its odd end
address. Not sure yet, but maybe it's better to round up at the call
sites of kvm_set_user_memory_region.

Well if the destroyer does not call with the same region it's totally broken, no?

Alex





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]