qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] introduce on_vcpu


From: Anthony Liguori
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] introduce on_vcpu
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 16:19:54 -0500
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090320)

Glauber Costa wrote:
on_vcpu is a qemu-kvm function that will make sure that a specific
piece of code will run on a requested cpu. We don't need that because
we're restricted to -smp 1 right now, but those days are likely to end soon.

So for the benefit of having qemu-kvm share more code with us, I'm
introducing our own version of on_vcpu(). Right now, we either run
a function on the current cpu, or abort the execution, because it would
mean something is seriously wrong.

As an example code, I "ported" kvm_update_guest_debug to use it,
with some slight differences from qemu-kvm.

This is probably 0.12 material

Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <address@hidden>
CC: Jan Kiszka <address@hidden>
---
 kvm-all.c |   37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 1 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kvm-all.c b/kvm-all.c
index 4e913e5..1d91f2e 100644
--- a/kvm-all.c
+++ b/kvm-all.c
@@ -39,6 +39,8 @@
     do { } while (0)
 #endif
+CPUState *current_env;
+
 typedef struct KVMSlot
 {
     target_phys_addr_t start_addr;
@@ -145,6 +147,14 @@ static int kvm_set_user_memory_region(KVMState *s, KVMSlot 
*slot)
     return kvm_vm_ioctl(s, KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION, &mem);
 }
+static void on_vcpu(CPUState *env, void (*func)(void *data), void *data)
+{
+    if (env == current_env) {

Can't you just use cpu_single_env?

+        func(data);
+        return;
+    }
+    assert(1);

Wouldn't assert(env == current_env) or abort() make more sense?

Regards,

Anthony Liguori




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]