[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCHv4 4/5] qemu/msi: missing braces
From: |
Michael S. Tsirkin |
Subject: |
[Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCHv4 4/5] qemu/msi: missing braces |
Date: |
Sun, 5 Jul 2009 14:56:01 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) |
On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 02:48:12PM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On 7/5/09, Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden> wrote:
> > MSIX present bit is tested incorrectly, and only happens to work because
> > the bit we are testing is 0x1. Add braces to fix this.
> >
> > Reported-by: Blue Swirl <address@hidden>
> > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden>
> > ---
> > hw/msix.c | 2 +-
> > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/msix.c b/hw/msix.c
> > index 33549f5..db72cc3 100644
> > --- a/hw/msix.c
> > +++ b/hw/msix.c
> > @@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ void msix_load(PCIDevice *dev, QEMUFile *f)
> > {
> > unsigned n = dev->msix_entries_nr;
> >
> > - if (!dev->cap_present & QEMU_PCI_CAP_MSIX)
> > + if (!(dev->cap_present & QEMU_PCI_CAP_MSIX))
>
> With the braces comment I meant that while working on the code, you
> should update it to match CODING_STYLE:
> if (!(dev->cap_present & QEMU_PCI_CAP_MSIX)) {
> return;
> }
Yea ... it's probably better to do this all over the file, not piecewise,
though. No?
--
MST