Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Killing KQEMU

[Gerd Hoffmann]

On 06/02/09 22:09, Chris Frey wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 01:54:30PM +0100, Paul Brook wrote:
> > osdep.c:/* FIXME: This file should be target independent. However it has kqemu
> > vl.c:    /* FIXME: This is a nasty hack because kqemu can't cope with dynamic
> > cpu-common.h: #ifdef CONFIG_KQEMU /* FIXME: This is wrong.  */
> > exec.c: #elif defined(TARGET_X86_64)&&  !defined(CONFIG_KQEMU)
>
> These are fairly small annoyances, no?  I'm assuming they are, since they
> exist at all, considering the frustration evident in:

One becoming more and more annonying as machine sizes grow is that kqemu 
can't handle more than 4GB of guest memory even on 64bit hosts.  And it 
is a compile time, not a runtime dependency, i.e. the same limit is 
forced on the qemu binary too.  To run big guests you have to build qemu 
without kqemu support.

I think that one is #4 in the list above.

> > Or let me put it another way: At some point I'll get fed up of the
> > limitations that kqemu currently imposes, and deliberately break it.
>
> I would hope that anyone who deliberately breaks kqemu support would be
> kind enough to post that fact to the mailing list, with a description of
> what's broken and why, so that others may step up to the plate and fix it.

Removing the 4GB limit mentioned from the qemu code base above will make 
kqemu stop working.

cheers,
  Gerd