[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] [RFC] cleanup cpu-exec.c: consolidate handle_cp
From: |
Paul Brook |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] [RFC] cleanup cpu-exec.c: consolidate handle_cpu_signal |
Date: |
Thu, 30 Apr 2009 17:10:38 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.9 |
> I don't understand what the "activate soft MMU for this block" is trying
> to do. (Especially since handle_cpu_signal and company are under
> !defined(CONFIG_SOFTMMU)...) Even though it appears that if
> cpu_*_handle_mmu_fault ever returns a value > 0, that value is always
> one and therefore that block is superfluous, I've left that cleanup for
> a later time. Likewise for why x86 has a different EXCEPTION_ACTION
> than everyone else.
This is most likely a remnant of the long-deceased qemu-fast, which used mmap
tricks to avoid MMU emulation in system mode.
Paul
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] [RFC] cleanup cpu-exec.c: consolidate handle_cpu_signal, Nathan Froyd, 2009/04/21
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] [RFC] cleanup cpu-exec.c: consolidate handle_cpu_signal,
Paul Brook <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] [RFC] cleanup cpu-exec.c: consolidate handle_cpu_signal, Avi Kivity, 2009/04/30
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] [RFC] cleanup cpu-exec.c: consolidate handle_cpu_signal, Paul Brook, 2009/04/30
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] [RFC] cleanup cpu-exec.c: consolidate handle_cpu_signal, Avi Kivity, 2009/04/30
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] [RFC] cleanup cpu-exec.c: consolidate handle_cpu_signal, Blue Swirl, 2009/04/30
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] [RFC] cleanup cpu-exec.c: consolidate handle_cpu_signal, Avi Kivity, 2009/04/30
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] [RFC] cleanup cpu-exec.c: consolidate handle_cpu_signal, Blue Swirl, 2009/04/30
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] [RFC] cleanup cpu-exec.c: consolidate handle_cpu_signal, Laurent Desnogues, 2009/04/30