[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [7234] Use a more natural order
From: |
Lennart Sorensen |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [7234] Use a more natural order |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Apr 2009 15:46:27 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 09:37:05PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> > It may be more natural, but it is also less safe.
> >
> > After all
> >
> > if (0 = x) {
> >
> > fails compile, while
> >
> > if (x = 0) {
> >
> > compiles silently even when you didn't mean that.
>
> Today gcc will warn you as well. Of course this means you have to look
> at warnings.
True. You can tell it off by doing if ((x = 0)) it seems.
Always safer to treat warnings as errors it seems.
--
Len Sorensen
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [7234] Use a more natural order, (continued)
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [7234] Use a more natural order, M. Warner Losh, 2009/04/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [7234] Use a more natural order, Lennart Sorensen, 2009/04/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [7234] Use a more natural order, M. Warner Losh, 2009/04/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [7234] Use a more natural order, Lennart Sorensen, 2009/04/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [7234] Use a more natural order, M. Warner Losh, 2009/04/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [7234] Use a more natural order, Lennart Sorensen, 2009/04/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [7234] Use a more natural order, Jamie Lokier, 2009/04/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [7234] Use a more natural order, Jamie Lokier, 2009/04/23
[Qemu-devel] Re: [7234] Use a more natural order, Jan Kiszka, 2009/04/23
Re: [Qemu-devel] [7234] Use a more natural order, Gerd Hoffmann, 2009/04/24