[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Qemu-devel] ANNOUNCE: QEMU 0.10.0 stable branch
From: |
Dietmar Maurer |
Subject: |
RE: [Qemu-devel] ANNOUNCE: QEMU 0.10.0 stable branch |
Date: |
Mon, 9 Mar 2009 09:48:21 +0100 |
I just wonder if 0.XX is a good name for a stable release. May is suggest to
increase the major number (1.XX).
> -----Original Message-----
> From: address@hidden [mailto:address@hidden On
> Behalf Of Anthony Liguori
> Sent: Sonntag, 08. März 2009 17:13
> To: Avi Kivity
> Cc: address@hidden; kvm-devel
> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] ANNOUNCE: QEMU 0.10.0 stable branch
>
> Avi Kivity wrote:
> >
> > In this case, the branch ought to be called stable_0_10, no?
>
> That's not a bad idea if everyone agrees that 0.10.1 is good stable
> naming convention. I was hoping to have the first stable release about
> 2 weeks after the 0.10.0 release FWIW. There's already some good stuff
> in the stable tree.
- Re: [Qemu-devel] ANNOUNCE: QEMU 0.10.0 stable branch, (continued)
- Re: [Qemu-devel] ANNOUNCE: QEMU 0.10.0 stable branch, Avi Kivity, 2009/03/08
- Re: [Qemu-devel] ANNOUNCE: QEMU 0.10.0 stable branch, Anthony Liguori, 2009/03/08
- Re: [Qemu-devel] ANNOUNCE: QEMU 0.10.0 stable branch, Daniel P. Berrange, 2009/03/09
- RE: [Qemu-devel] ANNOUNCE: QEMU 0.10.0 stable branch,
Dietmar Maurer <=
- Re: [Bulk] RE: [Qemu-devel] ANNOUNCE: QEMU 0.10.0 stable branch, Doug Schaefer, 2009/03/10
- Re: [Qemu-devel] ANNOUNCE: QEMU 0.10.0 stable branch, Paul Brook, 2009/03/10
- RE: [Qemu-devel] ANNOUNCE: QEMU 0.10.0 stable branch, Dietmar Maurer, 2009/03/11
- Re: [Qemu-devel] ANNOUNCE: QEMU 0.10.0 stable branch, Laurent Desnogues, 2009/03/11
- Re: [Qemu-devel] ANNOUNCE: QEMU 0.10.0 stable branch, Paul Brook, 2009/03/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] ANNOUNCE: QEMU 0.10.0 stable branch, Anthony Liguori, 2009/03/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] ANNOUNCE: QEMU 0.10.0 stable branch, Avi Kivity, 2009/03/09