[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] Cutting a new QEMU release
|
From: |
Riku Voipio |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] Cutting a new QEMU release |
|
Date: |
Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:40:24 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 02:48:22PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> We could decide to cut one by the end of the month.
This would indeed be really cool.
> .. to decide if there's anything we need to fix before a release.
At least the OS X (cocoa) host is broken, which is IMHO pretty
bad regression. Apart from that I'm not aware of any major regression
(wearing arm-linux-user, some arm-softmmu and debian hats).
--
"rm -rf" only sounds scary if you don't have backups
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Cutting a new QEMU release, (continued)
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Cutting a new QEMU release, Mark McLoughlin, 2009/02/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Cutting a new QEMU release,
Riku Voipio <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Cutting a new QEMU release, Stefano Stabellini, 2009/02/13
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Cutting a new QEMU release, Jamie Lokier, 2009/02/13
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Revert block-qcow2.c to kvm-72 version due to corruption reports, Anthony Liguori, 2009/02/14
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Revert block-qcow2.c to kvm-72 version due to corruption reports, Jamie Lokier, 2009/02/14
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Revert block-qcow2.c to kvm-72 version due to corruption reports, Anthony Liguori, 2009/02/14
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Revert block-qcow2.c to kvm-72 version due to corruption reports, Jamie Lokier, 2009/02/15