[Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 2/3] NUMA: promoting NUMA topology to BIOS and pin guest memory

[Avi Kivity]

Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > ACK. Actually I'd had to add code to prevent pinning from the command 
> > line. I think this doesn't hurt, if you use virtualization for 
> > partitioning (where a NUMA architecture can actually help you, 
> > because guests don't compete will all other guests for the memory 
> > bandwidth), it is quite helpful to specify everything at the beginning.
>
> The thing that makes me uneasy about it is the fact that it's part of 
> the base numa syntax.  This combination of guest configuration and 
> host configuration seems less than optimal to me.  This isn't 
> something that bothers me that much and won't keep me from applying 
> the patches.

I also think that it would be good to separate guest and host 
configuration, like -net nic and -net tap.

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function