|
From: | Anthony Liguori |
Subject: | Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 1/3] Only call aio flush handler if set |
Date: | Tue, 23 Sep 2008 09:34:55 -0500 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080723) |
Ryan Harper wrote:
* Anthony Liguori <address@hidden> [2008-09-22 21:49]:Ryan Harper wrote:If the aio handler doesn't register an io_flush handler, we'd SEGV; fix that by only calling the flush handler if set. BTW, aio handlers *should* register anJust not doing an io_flush is just hiding the real bug--that the user didn't register an io_flush handler. If the inevitable SEGV is not yourio_flush routine. Signed-off-by: Ryan Harper <address@hidden> diff --git a/aio.c b/aio.c index 687e4be..2bb3ed4 100644 --- a/aio.c +++ b/aio.c @@ -105,7 +105,8 @@ void qemu_aio_flush(void) ret = 0; LIST_FOREACH(node, &aio_handlers, node) { - ret |= node->io_flush(node->opaque); + if (node->io_flush) + ret |= node->io_flush(node->opaque); }That may be true, but it it is no different than the check for read and write handlers in qemu_aio_wait().
Read and write handlers are optional. I guess in practice one or the other should be set but neither one is individually required. The problem with your patch is that it takes something that is a bug, and makes it more difficult to spot. So it actually makes things worse.
Regards, Anthony Liguori
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |