[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] s390-dis.c license
From: |
M. Warner Losh |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] s390-dis.c license |
Date: |
Thu, 17 Jan 2008 14:44:58 -0700 (MST) |
In message: <address@hidden>
"Bill C. Riemers" <address@hidden> writes:
: According to section 9 of the GPL, you would only have to contact
: contributors for code which specified version 2 of the GPL and not later...
I said exactly this in a previous message. At one point I recalled
seeing some code that was gpl2-only in the tree. I can't find it now,
so either I'm mistaken, or it has gone away.
The key point being, however, that if there is such code, or any other
code that's licensed under a license that isn't compatible with gplv3,
simple notice on a public forum is not sufficient from a legal point
of view.
Warner
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] s390-dis.c license, (continued)
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] s390-dis.c license, Ricardo Almeida, 2008/01/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] s390-dis.c license, M. Warner Losh, 2008/01/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] s390-dis.c license, Bill C. Riemers, 2008/01/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] s390-dis.c license, andrzej zaborowski, 2008/01/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] s390-dis.c license, Thiemo Seufer, 2008/01/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] s390-dis.c license, M. Warner Losh, 2008/01/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] s390-dis.c license, Johannes Schindelin, 2008/01/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] s390-dis.c license, M. Warner Losh, 2008/01/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] s390-dis.c license, Thiemo Seufer, 2008/01/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] s390-dis.c license, andrzej zaborowski, 2008/01/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] s390-dis.c license,
M. Warner Losh <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] s390-dis.c license, Thiemo Seufer, 2008/01/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] s390-dis.c license, Thiemo Seufer, 2008/01/17