On 9/17/07, Philip Boulain <address@hidden> wrote:
DON'T DO THIS KIND OF COMMIT AGAIN, PLEASE.
if we were using git (but you can do it locally anyway), you
would not
have these conflicts problems...
Maybe... but Savannah uses a CVS frontend, as far as I know...
Those are excuses.
So is a "you should have used X" argument. It doesn't invalidate the
point that the commit was disruptive, and merely acts as bait for the
grand old "version repository" flamewar.*
since I mentionned "you should have used Git", I'll repeat:
this commit was not disruptive to any of the Git users, and will
never be.
Evolve, or prepare to be assimilated into the Collective...