[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] Stupid (probably) idea wrt dyngen & gcc 3.4 & 4.0
From: |
Sebastian Kaliszewski |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] Stupid (probably) idea wrt dyngen & gcc 3.4 & 4.0 |
Date: |
Mon, 9 May 2005 03:55:24 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.4.3 |
So the idea was indeed stupid :)
On Monday 09 May 2005 02:40, Paul Brook wrote:
> No. The main problem with gcc3.4 was that we weren't using FORCE_RET
> everywhere that we should. This has mostly been fixed now.
I see...
[snip]
>
> I've got a solution for x86/x86-64 that's 95% complete, using the method
> I suggested in a previous email.
So, since ret is too small to be replaced with jump, you relocate the block
following ret few bytes further, and retarget all relevant jumps?
> I hope to be submitting a patch shortly.
> I expect most other hosts (particularly the RISC based ones) to be much
> simpler to fix.
Nice.
rgds
Sebastian Kaliszewski