qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu/hw openpic.c


From: Fabrice Bellard
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu/hw openpic.c
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 00:05:53 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040913

This fix was already commited in the CVS.

Fabrice.

Thayne Harbaugh wrote:
On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 19:01 -0500, Fabrice Bellard wrote:

CVSROOT:        /cvsroot/qemu
Module name:    qemu
Branch:         
Changes by:     Fabrice Bellard <address@hidden>  05/02/09 00:01:34

Modified files:
hw : openpic.c
Log message:
        spelling fix

CVSWeb URLs:
http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/qemu/qemu/hw/openpic.c.diff?tr1=1.5&tr2=1.6&r1=text&r2=text



There was another change in openpic.c that I haven't seen committed:

@@ -629,7 +629,7 @@
         break;
     case 0x10: /* TIBC */
        if ((opp->timers[idx].ticc & 0x80000000) != 0 &&
-           (val & 0x800000000) == 0 &&
+           (val & 0x80000000) == 0 &&
             (opp->timers[idx].tibc & 0x80000000) != 0)
            opp->timers[idx].ticc &= ~0x80000000;
        opp->timers[idx].tibc = val;


It's because the constant 0x800000000 is larger than a uint32_t (it
appears that the way it was will always cause "(val & 0x800000000) == 0"
to always be true).  I haven't tested it - I just made the change
because it looked "obvious".  Please let me know if there's some black
magic that this "fix" breaks.




_______________________________________________
Qemu-devel mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel







reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]