[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu FreeBSD port update, unbreaking RELENG_5 and -curr
From: |
Norikatsu Shigemura |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu FreeBSD port update, unbreaking RELENG_5 and -current |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Oct 2004 18:39:17 +0900 (JST) |
On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 19:18:22 +0200
Juergen Lock <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi!
> Just FYI: I have submitted an update for the FreeBSD port,
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=72945
> it has not been committed until now (maybe the ports committers are
> too busy with other updates after the end of that long freeze...
I'll handle this. Yes. Sorry, please wait:-).
> At least my previous updates were committed much quicker)
> But you can grab the update out of the raw PR
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=72945&f=raw
> and apply it to your ports tree manually (don't forget to remove the
> two patch files it mentions), and then build the port as normal.
I have a patch which provides SB16 device on FreeBSD.
On FreeBSD, sb16(sbc) driver finds it like following
process.
out(0x226, 3);
(100 micro sec busy loop)
out(0x226, 0);
while( in(0x22e) & 0x80 ) {
(20 micro sec busy loop / MAX 1000 repeat)
}
if( in(0x22a) == 0xaa ) {
FOUND!
} else {
NOT FOUND!
}
So I changed (val == 1) to (val & 1), do you think so?
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
--- qemu-snapshot-2004-08-26_23/hw/sb16.c.orig Tue Jun 8 05:58:31 2004
+++ qemu-snapshot-2004-08-26_23/hw/sb16.c Sun Sep 5 09:55:31 2004
@@ -463,7 +463,7 @@
control (0);
if (0 == val)
dsp->v2x6 = 0;
- else if ((1 == val) && (0 == dsp->v2x6)) {
+ else if ((val&0x1) && (0 == dsp->v2x6)) {
dsp->v2x6 = 1;
dsp_out_data(dsp, 0xaa);
}
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -