[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] Impractical ideas?
From: |
Chad Page |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] Impractical ideas? |
Date: |
Fri, 7 May 2004 10:51:17 -0700 (PDT) |
Well, you *could* add qemu to ndiswrapper and make a powerpc
version. Matching up code for disparate kernels would be incredibly
difficult - if ndiswrapper itself is native PPC it's much more likely to
work!
- Chad
On Fri, 7 May 2004, Irvin Probst wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-05-07 at 11:44, David Woodhouse wrote:
> >
> > Someone was muttering the other day about the possibility of putting
> > qemu in the kernel and using it to run i386 binary-only modules in
> > non-i386 host kernels.
> >
> > I think it's a sick idea, but I might look at it anyway. After all, it's
> > no worse than running the ACPI crap in an interpreter.
>
> Powerbook owners are gonna love you if it works for their airport
> extreme wifi cards (broadcom). Of course using linuxppc + kqemu +
> ndiswrapper + a windows driver is a bit crazy...
>
> --
> Irvin Probst
> There are 10 types of people in the world... those who understand binary
> and those who don't.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qemu-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
>
Re: [Qemu-devel] Impractical ideas?, David Woodhouse, 2004/05/07