qemu-block
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] throttle: introduce enum ThrottleType


From: Hanna Czenczek
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] throttle: introduce enum ThrottleType
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2023 17:42:37 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.13.0

On 13.07.23 08:41, zhenwei pi wrote:
Use enum ThrottleType instead of number index.

Reviewed-by: Alberto Garcia<berto@igalia.com>
Signed-off-by: zhenwei pi<pizhenwei@bytedance.com>
---
  include/qemu/throttle.h | 11 ++++++++---
  util/throttle.c         | 16 +++++++++-------
  2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

[...]

diff --git a/util/throttle.c b/util/throttle.c
index 81f247a8d1..5642e61763 100644
--- a/util/throttle.c
+++ b/util/throttle.c
@@ -199,10 +199,12 @@ static bool throttle_compute_timer(ThrottleState *ts,
  void throttle_timers_attach_aio_context(ThrottleTimers *tt,
                                          AioContext *new_context)
  {
-    tt->timers[0] = aio_timer_new(new_context, tt->clock_type, SCALE_NS,
-                                  tt->read_timer_cb, tt->timer_opaque);
-    tt->timers[1] = aio_timer_new(new_context, tt->clock_type, SCALE_NS,
-                                  tt->write_timer_cb, tt->timer_opaque);
+    tt->timers[THROTTLE_READ] =
+        aio_timer_new(new_context, tt->clock_type, SCALE_NS,
+                      tt->timer_cb[THROTTLE_READ], tt->timer_opaque);
+    tt->timers[THROTTLE_WRITE] =
+        aio_timer_new(new_context, tt->clock_type, SCALE_NS,
+                      tt->timer_cb[THROTTLE_WRITE], tt->timer_opaque);

This could benefit from the new structure:

```
for (int i = 0; i < THROTTLE_MAX; i++) {
    tt->timers[i] = aio_timer_new(..., tt->timer_cb[i], ...);
}
```

Even more so after patch 3.  Still, optional, of course, so either way:

Reviewed-by: Hanna Czenczek <hreitz@redhat.com>

Of note is that we still have instances in util/throttle.c and block/throttle-groups.c that don’t use these enums to access the tt->timers[] array, and that’s a bit unfortunate now (i.e. `tt->timers[is_write]` should rather be `tt->timers[is_write ? THROTTLE_WRITE : THROTTLE_READ]` instead).  But functionally it’s OK and I believe patches 3 and 6 do address this.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]