Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] docs: Fix next function numbers in SR/IOV documentation

[Michael S. Tsirkin]

On Sun, Jul 02, 2023 at 06:46:25PM +0900, Akihiko Odaki wrote:
> The ARI next function number field is undefined for VF so the PF should
> end the linked list formed with the field by specifying 0.
> 
> This also changes the value of the field for VF; it seems to imply the
> value has some meaning if it differs from one of the PF, but it doesn't.
> 
> Fixes: 2503461691 ("pcie: Add some SR/IOV API documentation in 
> docs/pcie_sriov.txt")
> Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
> ---
>  docs/pcie_sriov.txt | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/docs/pcie_sriov.txt b/docs/pcie_sriov.txt
> index 7eff7f2703..2b7094dc47 100644
> --- a/docs/pcie_sriov.txt
> +++ b/docs/pcie_sriov.txt
> @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ setting up a BAR for a VF.
>        ...
>        int ret = pcie_endpoint_cap_init(d, 0x70);
>        ...
> -      pcie_ari_init(d, 0x100, 1);
> +      pcie_ari_init(d, 0x100, 0);
>        ...
>  
>        /* Add and initialize the SR/IOV capability */
> @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ setting up a BAR for a VF.
>        ...
>        int ret = pcie_endpoint_cap_init(d, 0x60);
>        ...
> -      pcie_ari_init(d, 0x100, 1);
> +      pcie_ari_init(d, 0x100, 0);
>        ...
>        memory_region_init(mr, ... )
>        pcie_sriov_vf_register_bar(d, bar_nr, mr);


So now code does not match docs.


> -- 
> 2.41.0