|
From: | Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy |
Subject: | Re: [Qemu-block] [PULL 6/8] iotest 205: new test for qmp nbd-server-remove |
Date: | Mon, 5 Feb 2018 15:48:26 +0300 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 |
05.02.2018 12:24, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 26.01.2018 um 17:04 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <address@hidden> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <address@hidden> Message-Id: <address@hidden> [eblake: adjust to next available test number] Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <address@hidden> --- tests/qemu-iotests/205 | 156 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ tests/qemu-iotests/205.out | 5 ++ tests/qemu-iotests/group | 1 + 3 files changed, 162 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tests/qemu-iotests/205 create mode 100644 tests/qemu-iotests/205.outThis test case fails for luks. Maybe it's easy enough to enable luks, or maybe we have to disable it. Not sure how other Python test cases handle this. Can you have a look, please? Kevin
Hmm. check -luks 205 ...+qemu-img: /work/src/qemu/master/tests/qemu-iotests/scratch/disk: Parameter 'key-secret' is required for cipher
I've looked through (grep-ped through) tests, and found only one python test with key-secret: 149. And it has own qemu_img_create() function.
On the other hand, all python tests, which have "qemu_img('create'" pattern, do not support luks. So, it should be easier to disable luks here.
I'll send a patch. Also, why check-block do not check luks? -- Best regards, Vladimir
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |