qemu-block
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-block] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v14 11/21] qapi: add integer range


From: Markus Armbruster
Subject: Re: [Qemu-block] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v14 11/21] qapi: add integer range support for QObjectInputVisitor
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 20:14:52 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)

Kevin Wolf <address@hidden> writes:

> Am 12.10.2016 um 17:50 hat Markus Armbruster geschrieben:
>> "Daniel P. Berrange" <address@hidden> writes:
>> 
>> > The traditional CLI arg syntax allows two ways to specify
>> > integer lists, either one value per key, or a range of
>> > values per key. eg the following are identical:
>> >
>> >   -arg foo=5,foo=6,foo=7
>> >   -arg foo=5-7
>> >
>> > This extends the QObjectInputVisitor so that it is able
>> > to parse ranges and turn them into distinct list entries.
>> >
>> > This means that
>> >
>> >   -arg foo=5-7
>> >
>> > is treated as equivalent to
>> >
>> >   -arg foo.0=5,foo.1=6,foo.2=7
>> >
>> > Edge case tests are copied from test-opts-visitor to
>> > ensure identical behaviour when parsing.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <address@hidden>
>
>> > @@ -329,21 +335,87 @@ static void 
>> > qobject_input_type_int64_autocast(Visitor *v, const char *name,
>> >                                                int64_t *obj, Error **errp)
>> >  {
>> >      QObjectInputVisitor *qiv = to_qiv(v);
>> > -    QString *qstr = qobject_to_qstring(qobject_input_get_object(qiv, name,
>> > -                                                                true));
>> > +    QString *qstr;
>> >      int64_t ret;
>> > +    const char *end = NULL;
>> > +    StackObject *tos;
>> > +    bool inlist = false;
>> > +
>> > +    /* Preferentially generate values from a range, before
>> > +     * trying to consume another QList element */
>> > +    tos = QSLIST_FIRST(&qiv->stack);
>> > +    if (tos) {
>> > +        if ((int64_t)tos->range_val < (int64_t)tos->range_limit) {
>> > +            *obj = tos->range_val + 1;
>> > +            tos->range_val++;
>> 
>> Roundabout way to write
>> 
>>                *obj = tos->range_val++;
>
> *obj = ++tos->range_val, actually.

Of course, thanks.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]