[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-block] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.7 v5 00/14] nbd: efficient wr
From: |
Fam Zheng |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-block] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.7 v5 00/14] nbd: efficient write zeroes |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Jul 2016 14:33:31 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) |
On Mon, 07/18 22:07, Eric Blake wrote:
> The upstream NBD protocol is proposing an extension for efficient
> write zeroes; having a qemu implementation will be one of the reasons
> to promote the proposal from experimental to standard:
> https://github.com/yoe/nbd/blob/extension-write-zeroes/doc/proto.md
My apologies for the last minute reviewing (I've been doing poor in processing
my backlog recently)!
The only question I have is about the relationship between NO_HOLE and
MAY_UNMAP, maybe you or Paolo can clarify that. Otherwise, the series looks
good. I've left a few other superficial questions to individual patches.
Thanks for the work!
Fam
- Re: [Qemu-block] semantics of FIEMAP without FIEMAP_FLAG_SYNC (was Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 13/14] nbd: Implement NBD_CMD_WRITE_ZEROES on server), (continued)
[Qemu-block] [PATCH v5 10/14] nbd: Less allocation during NBD_OPT_LIST, Eric Blake, 2016/07/19
[Qemu-block] [PATCH v5 12/14] nbd: Improve server handling of shutdown requests, Eric Blake, 2016/07/19
[Qemu-block] [PATCH v5 07/14] nbd: Share common option-sending code in client, Eric Blake, 2016/07/19
[Qemu-block] [PATCH v5 11/14] nbd: Support shorter handshake, Eric Blake, 2016/07/19
[Qemu-block] [PATCH v5 14/14] nbd: Implement NBD_CMD_WRITE_ZEROES on client, Eric Blake, 2016/07/19
Re: [Qemu-block] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.7 v5 00/14] nbd: efficient write zeroes,
Fam Zheng <=
Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH for-2.7 v5 00/14] nbd: efficient write zeroes, Paolo Bonzini, 2016/07/19