qemu-block
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH v4 01/14] block: Add "file" output parameter to


From: Fam Zheng
Subject: Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH v4 01/14] block: Add "file" output parameter to block status query functions
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 12:16:51 +0800
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Mon, 01/04 22:00, Max Reitz wrote:
> On 24.12.2015 06:50, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > The added parameter can be used to return the BDS pointer which the
> > valid offset is referring to. It's value should be ignored unless
> 
> *Its
> 
> > BDRV_BLOCK_OFFSET_VALID in ret is set.
> > 
> > Until block drivers fill in the right value, let's clear it explicitly
> > right before calling .bdrv_get_block_status.
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <address@hidden>
> > Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <address@hidden>
> > ---
> >  block/io.c                | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> >  block/iscsi.c             |  6 ++++--
> >  block/mirror.c            |  3 ++-
> >  block/parallels.c         |  2 +-
> >  block/qcow.c              |  2 +-
> >  block/qcow2.c             |  2 +-
> >  block/qed.c               |  3 ++-
> >  block/raw-posix.c         |  3 ++-
> >  block/raw_bsd.c           |  3 ++-
> >  block/sheepdog.c          |  2 +-
> >  block/vdi.c               |  2 +-
> >  block/vmdk.c              |  2 +-
> >  block/vpc.c               |  2 +-
> >  block/vvfat.c             |  2 +-
> >  include/block/block.h     |  6 ++++--
> >  include/block/block_int.h |  3 ++-
> >  qemu-img.c                |  7 +++++--
> >  17 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
> > 
> 
> [...]
> 
> > diff --git a/include/block/block.h b/include/block/block.h
> > index db8e096..70b4984 100644
> > --- a/include/block/block.h
> > +++ b/include/block/block.h
> 
> The comment explaining BDRV_BLOCK_OFFSET_VALID should be changed
> accordingly (you could also say "fixed", because apparently it wasn't
> always bs->file; sometimes it was bs itself (in case of raw-posix, iscsi
> and sheepdog)).

Yes, good point! Will fix this, and the typo above.

Fam



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]