[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-block] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/3] block: Extrace bdrv_parse_d
From: |
Fam Zheng |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-block] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/3] block: Extrace bdrv_parse_detect_zeroes_flags |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Jun 2015 17:24:16 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
On Wed, 06/10 17:11, Fam Zheng wrote:
> On Mon, 06/08 16:53, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 08/06/2015 16:17, Eric Blake wrote:
> > >> > +
> > >> > + if (detect_zeroes == BLOCKDEV_DETECT_ZEROES_OPTIONS_UNMAP &&
> > >> > + !(bdrv_flags & BDRV_O_UNMAP)) {
> > >> > + error_setg(errp, "setting detect-zeroes to unmap is not
> > >> > allowed "
> > >> > + "without setting discard operation to
> > >> > unmap");
> > >> > + }
> > > I think it might be better to have a tri-state enum, than to have two
> > > competing bools where only 3 of the 4 states are valid.
> >
> > Note that this is not a bool. We have one bool and one 3-element enum
> > (off/on/unmap), where only 5 of the 6 states are valid. Also, at least
> > detect-zeroes would go away if we had some kind of blockdev-mirror
> > (where the target is added first with blockdev-add), so I think it's
> > better to leave it separate.
>
> Agreed. But by then "drive-mirror derive=... detect-zeroes=unmap unmap=false"
s/derive/device/
> will be way too confusing.
>
> I say let's save that and just go for blockdev-add :)
>
> https://www.mail-archive.com/address@hidden/msg301990.html
>
> Fam
>
[Qemu-block] [PATCH v2 2/3] qapi: Add "detect-zeroes" option to drive-mirror, Fam Zheng, 2015/06/08
[Qemu-block] [PATCH v2 3/3] iotests: Add test cases for drive-mirror "detect-zeroes" option, Fam Zheng, 2015/06/08