qemu-arm
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[RFC PATCH v4 18/22] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Implement NMI interrupt prioirty


From: Jinjie Ruan
Subject: [RFC PATCH v4 18/22] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Implement NMI interrupt prioirty
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 09:29:42 +0000

If GICD_CTLR_DS bit is zero and the NMI is non-secure, the NMI prioirty
is higher than 0x80, otherwise it is higher than 0x0. And save NMI
super prioirty information in hppi.superprio to deliver NMI exception.
Since both GICR and GICD can deliver NMI, it is both necessary to check
whether the pending irq is NMI in gicv3_redist_update_noirqset and
gicv3_update_noirqset. And In irqbetter(), only a non-NMI with the same
priority and a smaller interrupt number can be preempted but not NMI.

Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
---
v4:
- Replace is_nmi with has_superprio to not a mix NMI and superpriority.
- Update the comment in irqbetter().
- Extract gicv3_get_priority() to avoid code repeat.
---
v3:
- Add missing brace
---
 hw/intc/arm_gicv3.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 63 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3.c b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3.c
index 0b8f79a122..1d16a53b23 100644
--- a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3.c
+++ b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3.c
@@ -21,7 +21,8 @@
 #include "hw/intc/arm_gicv3.h"
 #include "gicv3_internal.h"
 
-static bool irqbetter(GICv3CPUState *cs, int irq, uint8_t prio)
+static bool irqbetter(GICv3CPUState *cs, int irq, uint8_t prio,
+                      bool has_superprio)
 {
     /* Return true if this IRQ at this priority should take
      * precedence over the current recorded highest priority
@@ -33,11 +34,24 @@ static bool irqbetter(GICv3CPUState *cs, int irq, uint8_t 
prio)
     if (prio < cs->hppi.prio) {
         return true;
     }
+
+    /*
+     * Current highest prioirity pending interrupt is an IRQ without
+     * superpriority, the new IRQ with superpriority has same priority
+     * should signal to the CPU as it have the priority higher than
+     * the labelled 0x80 or 0x00.
+     */
+    if (prio == cs->hppi.prio && !cs->hppi.superprio && has_superprio) {
+        return true;
+    }
+
     /* If multiple pending interrupts have the same priority then it is an
      * IMPDEF choice which of them to signal to the CPU. We choose to
-     * signal the one with the lowest interrupt number.
+     * signal the one with the lowest interrupt number if they don't have
+     * superpriority.
      */
-    if (prio == cs->hppi.prio && irq <= cs->hppi.irq) {
+    if (prio == cs->hppi.prio && !cs->hppi.superprio &&
+        !has_superprio && irq <= cs->hppi.irq) {
         return true;
     }
     return false;
@@ -129,6 +143,35 @@ static uint32_t gicr_int_pending(GICv3CPUState *cs)
     return pend;
 }
 
+static bool gicv3_get_priority(GICv3CPUState *cs, bool is_redist,
+                               uint32_t superprio, uint8_t *prio, int irq)
+{
+    bool has_superprio = false;
+
+    if (superprio) {
+        has_superprio = true;
+
+        /* DS = 0 & Non-secure NMI */
+        if (!(cs->gic->gicd_ctlr & GICD_CTLR_DS) &&
+            ((is_redist && extract32(cs->gicr_igroupr0, irq, 1)) ||
+             (!is_redist && gicv3_gicd_group_test(cs->gic, irq)))) {
+            *prio = 0x80;
+        } else {
+            *prio = 0x0;
+        }
+    } else {
+        has_superprio = false;
+
+        if (is_redist) {
+            *prio = cs->gicr_ipriorityr[irq];
+        } else {
+            *prio = cs->gic->gicd_ipriority[irq];
+        }
+    }
+
+    return has_superprio;
+}
+
 /* Update the interrupt status after state in a redistributor
  * or CPU interface has changed, but don't tell the CPU i/f.
  */
@@ -141,6 +184,8 @@ static void gicv3_redist_update_noirqset(GICv3CPUState *cs)
     uint8_t prio;
     int i;
     uint32_t pend;
+    uint32_t superprio = 0;
+    bool has_superprio = false;
 
     /* Find out which redistributor interrupts are eligible to be
      * signaled to the CPU interface.
@@ -152,10 +197,13 @@ static void gicv3_redist_update_noirqset(GICv3CPUState 
*cs)
             if (!(pend & (1 << i))) {
                 continue;
             }
-            prio = cs->gicr_ipriorityr[i];
-            if (irqbetter(cs, i, prio)) {
+            superprio = extract32(cs->gicr_isuperprio, i, 1);
+            has_superprio = gicv3_get_priority(cs, true, superprio, &prio, i);
+
+            if (irqbetter(cs, i, prio, has_superprio)) {
                 cs->hppi.irq = i;
                 cs->hppi.prio = prio;
+                cs->hppi.superprio = has_superprio;
                 seenbetter = true;
             }
         }
@@ -168,7 +216,7 @@ static void gicv3_redist_update_noirqset(GICv3CPUState *cs)
     if ((cs->gicr_ctlr & GICR_CTLR_ENABLE_LPIS) && cs->gic->lpi_enable &&
         (cs->gic->gicd_ctlr & GICD_CTLR_EN_GRP1NS) &&
         (cs->hpplpi.prio != 0xff)) {
-        if (irqbetter(cs, cs->hpplpi.irq, cs->hpplpi.prio)) {
+        if (irqbetter(cs, cs->hpplpi.irq, cs->hpplpi.prio, false)) {
             cs->hppi.irq = cs->hpplpi.irq;
             cs->hppi.prio = cs->hpplpi.prio;
             cs->hppi.grp = cs->hpplpi.grp;
@@ -213,6 +261,8 @@ static void gicv3_update_noirqset(GICv3State *s, int start, 
int len)
     int i;
     uint8_t prio;
     uint32_t pend = 0;
+    uint32_t superprio = 0;
+    bool has_superprio = false;
 
     assert(start >= GIC_INTERNAL);
     assert(len > 0);
@@ -240,10 +290,15 @@ static void gicv3_update_noirqset(GICv3State *s, int 
start, int len)
              */
             continue;
         }
-        prio = s->gicd_ipriority[i];
-        if (irqbetter(cs, i, prio)) {
+
+        superprio = *gic_bmp_ptr32(s->superprio, i);
+        superprio = superprio & (1 << (i & 0x1f));
+        has_superprio = gicv3_get_priority(cs, false, superprio, &prio, i);
+
+        if (irqbetter(cs, i, prio, has_superprio)) {
             cs->hppi.irq = i;
             cs->hppi.prio = prio;
+            cs->hppi.superprio = has_superprio;
             cs->seenbetter = true;
         }
     }
-- 
2.34.1




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]