Re: [PATCH 11/14] target/arm: Implement the SETG* instructions

[Richard Henderson]

On 9/11/23 07:17, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > I think it would be a little better if set_tags was visible to the compiler, 
> > via inlining,
> > so that all of the conditions can be folded away.
>
> Do you mean having a separate triplet of helper functions
> for setg, which then call an inline function shared with
> the normal setp/setm/sete to do the actual work, rather than
> passing "is this setg" via the syndrome ?

Yes.


r~