qemu-arm
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-arm] [PATCH v2 07/11] hw/arm/virt-acpi-build: Add PC-DIMM in S


From: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
Subject: Re: [Qemu-arm] [PATCH v2 07/11] hw/arm/virt-acpi-build: Add PC-DIMM in SRAT
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 09:57:58 +0000


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Igor Mammedov [mailto:address@hidden
> Sent: 11 March 2019 14:55
> To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden; address@hidden;
> address@hidden; address@hidden;
> address@hidden; address@hidden;
> address@hidden; Linuxarm <address@hidden>; xuwei (O)
> <address@hidden>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/11] hw/arm/virt-acpi-build: Add PC-DIMM in SRAT
> 
> On Fri, 8 Mar 2019 11:42:14 +0000
> Shameer Kolothum <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> > Generate Memory Affinity Structures for PC-DIMM ranges.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Shameer Kolothum <address@hidden>
> > Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <address@hidden>
> > Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov <address@hidden>
> > ---
> >  hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c | 9 +++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c b/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c
> > index 87d66da..6cb7263 100644
> > --- a/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c
> > +++ b/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c
> > @@ -524,6 +524,7 @@ build_srat(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker,
> VirtMachineState *vms)
> >      int i, srat_start;
> >      uint64_t mem_base;
> >      MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_GET_CLASS(vms);
> > +    MachineState *ms = MACHINE(vms);
> >      const CPUArchIdList *cpu_list =
> mc->possible_cpu_arch_ids(MACHINE(vms));
> >
> >      srat_start = table_data->len;
> > @@ -549,6 +550,14 @@ build_srat(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker,
> VirtMachineState *vms)
> >          }
> >      }
> >
> > +    if (ms->device_memory) {
> > +        numamem = acpi_data_push(table_data, sizeof *numamem);
> > +        build_srat_memory(numamem, ms->device_memory->base,
> > +
> memory_region_size(&ms->device_memory->mr),
> > +                          nb_numa_nodes - 1,
> > +                          MEM_AFFINITY_HOTPLUGGABLE |
> MEM_AFFINITY_ENABLED);
> > +    }
> > +
> 
> do we care about 'Windows' guests?
> if yes then we should drop this patch,
> see commit for reasoning dbb6da8ba7e

If I understood that commit, that is reverting to use a single entry for whole
hotplug area instead of splitting into multiple entries. ie, remove
build_srat_hotpluggable_memory() and use build_srat_memory() instead,
which is what this patch does.

May be I am missing something here. Please let me know.

Thanks,
Shameer

> >      build_header(linker, table_data, (void *)(table_data->data +
> srat_start),
> >                   "SRAT", table_data->len - srat_start, 3, NULL, NULL);
> >  }




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]