qemu-arm
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-arm] [PATCH for 3.2 v2 6/7] hw/arm/bcm2835: Add basic support


From: Peter Maydell
Subject: Re: [Qemu-arm] [PATCH for 3.2 v2 6/7] hw/arm/bcm2835: Add basic support for cprman (clock subsystem)
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 16:02:24 +0000

On 2 November 2018 at 00:13, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden> wrote:
> Add basic support for BCM283x CPRMAN. Provide support for reading and
> writing CPRMAN registers and initialize registers with sensible default
> values. During runtime retain any written values.
>
> Basic CPRMAN support is necessary and sufficient to boot Linux on raspi2
> and raspi3 systems.
>
> Without this change, recent Linux kernels fail to boot on raspi2 and
> raspi3. raspi2 images experience with various divide by 0 errors and
> hang. raspi3 images fail to initialize the console (ttyS1).
>
> Register addresses and fields taken from the "BCM2835 ARM Peripherals"
> datasheet from February 06 2012:
> https://www.raspberrypi.org/app/uploads/2012/02/BCM2835-ARM-Peripherals.pdf
>
> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <address@hidden>
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden>
> ---
>  hw/arm/bcm2835_peripherals.c         |  16 +-
>  hw/misc/Makefile.objs                |   1 +
>  hw/misc/bcm2835_cprman.c             | 277 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  hw/misc/trace-events                 |   8 +
>  include/hw/arm/bcm2835_peripherals.h |   3 +-
>  include/hw/misc/bcm2835_cprman.h     |  28 +++
>  6 files changed, 331 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 hw/misc/bcm2835_cprman.c
>  create mode 100644 include/hw/misc/bcm2835_cprman.h
>
> diff --git a/hw/arm/bcm2835_peripherals.c b/hw/arm/bcm2835_peripherals.c
> index 108c058d17..11fb098063 100644
> --- a/hw/arm/bcm2835_peripherals.c
> +++ b/hw/arm/bcm2835_peripherals.c
> @@ -99,6 +99,11 @@ static void bcm2835_peripherals_init(Object *obj)
>      object_property_add_const_link(OBJECT(&s->property), "dma-mr",
>                                     OBJECT(&s->gpu_bus_mr), &error_abort);
>
> +    /* Clock subsystem */
> +    object_initialize(&s->cprman, sizeof(s->cprman), TYPE_BCM2835_CPRMAN);
> +    object_property_add_child(obj, "cprman", OBJECT(&s->cprman), NULL);
> +    qdev_set_parent_bus(DEVICE(&s->cprman), sysbus_get_default());

Rather than this set of 3 calls we can use one call:
    sysbus_init_child_obj(obj, "cprman", &s->cprman, sizeof(s->cprman),
                          TYPE_BCM2835_CPRMAN)

This is shorter and also avoids a refcount leak that means the
child object isn't correctly unlinked from the parent bus if the
parent device is destroyed.

(As separate cleanup, we could fix the existing cases of this pattern
in this file.)

> +
>      /* Random Number Generator */
>      object_initialize(&s->rng, sizeof(s->rng), TYPE_BCM2835_RNG);
>      object_property_add_child(obj, "rng", OBJECT(&s->rng), NULL);
> @@ -258,6 +263,13 @@ static void bcm2835_peripherals_realize(DeviceState 
> *dev, Error **errp)
>      sysbus_connect_irq(SYS_BUS_DEVICE(&s->property), 0,
>                        qdev_get_gpio_in(DEVICE(&s->mboxes), 
> MBOX_CHAN_PROPERTY));
>
> +    /* Clock subsystem */
> +    object_property_set_bool(OBJECT(&s->cprman), true, "realized", &err);
> +    if (err) {
> +        error_propagate(errp, err);
> +        return;
> +    }
> +
>      /* Random Number Generator */
>      object_property_set_bool(OBJECT(&s->rng), true, "realized", &err);
>      if (err) {
> @@ -265,6 +277,9 @@ static void bcm2835_peripherals_realize(DeviceState *dev, 
> Error **errp)
>          return;
>      }
>
> +    memory_region_add_subregion(&s->peri_mr, CPRMAN_OFFSET,
> +                sysbus_mmio_get_region(SYS_BUS_DEVICE(&s->cprman), 0));
> +
>      memory_region_add_subregion(&s->peri_mr, RNG_OFFSET,
>                  sysbus_mmio_get_region(SYS_BUS_DEVICE(&s->rng), 0));
>
> @@ -350,7 +365,6 @@ static void bcm2835_peripherals_realize(DeviceState *dev, 
> Error **errp)
>      }
>
>      create_unimp(s, &s->pm, "bcm2835-pm", PM_OFFSET, 0x1000);
> -    create_unimp(s, &s->cprman, "bcm2835-cprman", CPRMAN_OFFSET, 0x1000);
>      create_unimp(s, &s->a2w, "bcm2835-a2w", 0x102000, 0x1000);
>      create_unimp(s, &s->i2s, "bcm2835-i2s", I2S_OFFSET, 0x100);
>      create_unimp(s, &s->smi, "bcm2835-smi", SMI_OFFSET, 0x100);
> diff --git a/hw/misc/Makefile.objs b/hw/misc/Makefile.objs
> index 680350b3c3..93c11a2d4d 100644
> --- a/hw/misc/Makefile.objs
> +++ b/hw/misc/Makefile.objs
> @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_OMAP) += omap_tap.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_RASPI) += bcm2835_mbox.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_RASPI) += bcm2835_property.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_RASPI) += bcm2835_rng.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_RASPI) += bcm2835_cprman.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_SLAVIO) += slavio_misc.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_ZYNQ) += zynq_slcr.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_ZYNQ) += zynq-xadc.o
> diff --git a/hw/misc/bcm2835_cprman.c b/hw/misc/bcm2835_cprman.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..df7e92e77f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/hw/misc/bcm2835_cprman.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,277 @@
> +/*
> + * BCM2835 Clock subsystem (poor man's version)

Rather than saying this we should have a comment that says
that this is missing functionality and giving a summary
of what it does and does not implement.

> + * 
> https://www.raspberrypi.org/app/uploads/2012/02/BCM2835-ARM-Peripherals.pdf
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2018 Guenter Roeck <address@hidden>
> + * Copyright (C) 2018 Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden>
> + *
> + * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later

We don't use SPDX tags in QEMU at the moment, but I guess it's
clear enough what this means.

> + */
> +
> +#include "qemu/osdep.h"
> +#include "qemu/log.h"
> +#include "hw/misc/bcm2835_cprman.h"
> +#include "hw/register.h"
> +#include "trace.h"
> +
> +FIELD(CM,     PASSWD,   24, 8)
> +
> +FIELD(CM_CTL, SRC,       0, 4)
> +FIELD(CM_CTL, ENABLE,    4, 1)
> +FIELD(CM_CTL, KILL,      5, 1)
> +FIELD(CM_CTL, GATE,      6, 1)
> +FIELD(CM_CTL, BUSY,      7, 1)
> +FIELD(CM_CTL, BUSYD,     8, 1)
> +FIELD(CM_CTL, FRAC,      9, 1)
> +
> +FIELD(CM_DIV, FRAC,      0, 12)
> +FIELD(CM_DIV, INTEGER,  12, 12)
> +
> +enum cprman_clock_source {
> +    SRC_GND = 0,
> +    SRC_OSC = 1,
> +    SRC_TEST_DBG0 = 2,
> +    SRC_TEST_DBG1 = 3,
> +    SRC_PLLA_CORE = 4,
> +    SRC_PLLC_CORE0 = 5,
> +    SRC_PLLD_CORE = 6,
> +    SRC_PLLH_AUX = 7,
> +    SRC_PLLC_CORE1 = 8,
> +    SRC_PLLC_CORE2 = 9
> +};
> +
> +static const char *src_name(int src)
> +{
> +    static const char *src_names[16] = {
> +        [SRC_GND] = "GND",
> +        [SRC_OSC] = "OSC",
> +        [SRC_TEST_DBG0] = "TEST_DBG0",
> +        [SRC_TEST_DBG1] = "TEST_DBG1",
> +        [SRC_PLLA_CORE] = "PLLA_CORE",
> +        [SRC_PLLC_CORE0] = "PLLC_CORE0",
> +        [SRC_PLLD_CORE] = "PLLD_CORE",
> +        [SRC_PLLH_AUX] = "PLLH_AUX",
> +        [SRC_PLLC_CORE1] = "PLLC_CORE1",
> +        [SRC_PLLC_CORE2] = "PLLC_CORE2",
> +    };
> +    return src_names[src] ? src_names[src] : "UNKN";

I suspect it's not possible to get here with an array
index that's out of range, but I think it's easier to
review and to be sure the code isn't going to walk off the
end of the array if there's an explicit bounds check here.
Similarly for the regs[] array and others below.

thanks
-- PMM



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]