qemu-arm
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-arm] [RFC v2 1/4] hw/intc/arm_gicv3_its: Don't abort on table


From: Peter Maydell
Subject: Re: [Qemu-arm] [RFC v2 1/4] hw/intc/arm_gicv3_its: Don't abort on table save failure
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2017 11:13:14 +0000

On 6 November 2017 at 10:09, Auger Eric <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> On 02/11/2017 13:53, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 23 October 2017 at 16:35, Eric Auger <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> The ITS is not fully properly reset at the moment. Caches are
>>> not emptied.
>>>
>>> After a reset, in case we attempt to save the state before
>>> the bound devices have registered their MSIs and after the
>>> 1st level table has been allocated by the ITS driver
>>> (device BASER is valid), the first level entries are still
>>> invalid. If the device cache is not empty (devices registered
>>> before the reset), vgic_its_save_device_tables fails with -EINVAL.
>>> This causes a QEMU abort().
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <address@hidden>
>>> Reported-by: wanghaibin <address@hidden>
>>>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> this patch would deserve being cc'ed stable (2.10)
>>> This goes along with patches 1-5 of
>>> [PATCH v5 00/10] vITS Migration fixes and reset, candidate
>>> for being cc'ed stable
>>> ---
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <address@hidden>
>>
>> We could/should put this patch into qemu now, right (it's
>> the rest of the series that's RFC) ?
>
> Yes that's correct.

OK. I have applied 1/4 (and none of the rest) to target-arm.next,
with a cc-stable annotation.

thanks
-- PMM



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]